Anonymous ID: 56ff07 Dec. 28, 2020, 5:45 a.m. No.12208237   šŸ—„ļø.is šŸ”—kun   >>8273 >>8277

Edited

RICHARD TICE - SECOND IN COMMAND OF THE BREXIT PARTY TO NIGEL FARAGE, RECOMMENDS READING THIS THREAD- WORTH NOTING !!!

OVERVIEW - PCR testing is faulty and the results are not able to be verified by outside teams to validate their figures, Lighthouse Labs will not let anyone outside examine their methods or data ?

==

PLEASE read this incredible thread by my friend @MichaelYeadon3

on the flaws of mass govt PCR testingā€¦.the huge risk of PCR false positives from contamination in Govtā€™s Lighthouse laboratories.

https://twitter.com/TiceRichard/status/1343544361477406720

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1343464558581731328.html ā†link to thread !!

Anonymous ID: 56ff07 Dec. 28, 2020, 5:52 a.m. No.12208273   šŸ—„ļø.is šŸ”—kun

>>12208237

THE THREAD AND THE LINK TO THE THREAD !!

=

https://pandata.org/the-phe-data-that-goes-against-the-narrative-hunting-down-symptomatic-covid-19/

The PHE data that goes against the narrative - Hunting down symptomatic COVID-19 - PANDA

Followers know Iā€™m deeply suspicious of data from PCR mass testing. PCR fans might try to explain this analysis. 3 sets of data (PHE notifiable infectious diseaseā€¦

ā€¦ community symptom tracking & NHS triage classification of symptoms) all align in time but flatly contradict PCR ā€œcasesā€ data (which involves no symptoms). There are therefore three datasets all showing a second wave that begins in September, peaks two weeks later andā€¦

ā€¦ returns to baseline by the end of September.

Apart from PCR tests are two other diagnostic tests available for COVID-19:

Lateral flow tests which test for viral proteins that form part of the viral particles themselves and will detect a current infection

Antibody testingā€¦

ā€¦ which confirms infection two to five weeks afterward initial exposure.

Results of lateral flow testing in Liverpool and Merthyr Tydfil show a consistent positive rate of around 0.7-0.8%, at most a little higher that the 3rd party (independent) assessment f the operationalā€¦

ā€¦rate (oFPR). I note that mass testing of over 15,000 lorry drivers stranded at Manston Airport pending testing before crossing the channel (after the ridiculously exaggerated Govt response to the ā€˜new variantā€™ of the virus) also showed positivity bang on the oFPR for rapidā€¦

ā€¦antigen testing (LFT). Keen readers will also recall that in thousands of Cambridge students, 40 or so were in pools found positive by PCR mass testing, but on retesting, 100% of them were negative. More important even that the total failure of diagnostic testing is thatā€¦

ā€¦the students didnā€™t have the virus - none of them. Not just a few, but none. Thereā€™s a strong pattern here. On every occasion when the results of PCR mass testing are compared with any other measure - retesting by PCR, testing by an alternative method not subject to theā€¦

ā€¦flaws of PCR mass testing (over-amplification, cross contamination), multiple & independent measures of symptomatic disease, PCR mass testing FALLS ON ITS FACE. Come on, Lighthouse Labs staff. Stop pretending that your testing system measures anything at all. Itā€™s simplyā€¦

ā€¦not possible to trust your output. Are you aware that your output is being used to crush the life out of this country? Did you know that NO ONE is inspecting your facilities & methods? Worst of all, did you know that for months & months, those in charge of these Lighthouseā€¦

ā€¦Labs simply refuse to publish even an estimate of operational false positive rate? We do not know what fraction of tests come back positive, even if there is known to be no virus in the samples? Every test has an oFPR. We donā€™t know what it is for PCR mass testing in theā€¦

ā€¦current configuration. Its completely invalid to point to values for oFPR obtained for other PCR based testing systems. This because the main causes of false positives are contextual (volume of tests per day, experience of staff, etc).

CONTINUED

Anonymous ID: 56ff07 Dec. 28, 2020, 5:52 a.m. No.12208277   šŸ—„ļø.is šŸ”—kun

>>12208237

CONTINUED THREAD !!

Did you know that all medicalā€¦

ā€¦tests in use in the NHS have a data sheet, telling the physician how to interpret the test results? Without this basic information, which can be obtained easily in a single day without interfering with normal operation, itā€™s scientifically invalid to use the test at all, let..

ā€¦alone to do whatā€™s being done: to tell us that every sample which is reported as positive is actually a ā€œcaseā€. When the prevalence of the virus is low, which looks to be a statement we can make with robust confidence, even a modest-looking oFPR means that ALMOST ALLā€¦

ā€¦POSITIVES ARE FALSE POSITIVES. I support the triple challenge made by others. Letā€™s have a sizeable set of samples be run through the secretive Lighthouse Labs PCR mass testing system, through LFT & through independent PCR Labs. An alternative is to permit independentā€¦

ā€¦scientists into the Lighthouse Labs to supervise placing of known-negative (virus-free, but completely blinded swab samples) among a normal dayā€™s testing run. Until this has been done, I demand that PCR mass testing by halted. Thereā€™s very strong evidence that itā€™s veryā€¦

ā€¦.badly wrong & further, thereā€™s never been proper audit of what theyā€™re doing. We donā€™t even know why those facilities exist at all. No one anywhere had industrial scale testing right after the starting gun. But by May, the NHS pathology labs got to 50,000 tests per day.

By that time, the spring peak was well behind us. Imperial & itā€™s hopelessly unqualified team came up with their fantasy prediction of a huge 2nd wave, which is completely without precedent & not supported by any trove of scientific literature. But it seems that, based on theā€¦

ā€¦assumption that there would be a 2nd wave & so the then-prevailing view was that there was a need for much greater daily testing capacity. So the expensive notion of huge ā€˜PCR factoriesā€™ were set up, despite the fact this has never been done anywhere in the world. They wereā€¦

ā€¦set up at breakneck speed but then staffed mostly by people whoā€™ve never worked in labs before. Most of us were aghast at this, because PCR isnā€™t a technique for amateurs. According to those whoā€™ve personally used this exquisitely sensitive technique, using staff so unusedā€¦

ā€¦to lab work that they need to be taught how to use a pipette was always a recipe for disaster, both in terms of infection risk to themselves & colleagues as well as major risks to the absolutely essential end-to-end sample integrity. Now we learn that at least 20 staff atā€¦

ā€¦the Milton Keynes facility have become PCR positive themselves, something that seems likely to have been acquired at work. Previously, there was the unannounced inspections by the Health & Safety Executive, because thereā€™d been reports of serious breaches & management simply..

ā€¦refused to return calls from HSE. Those inspections confirmed major failings in health & safety procedures including in training. Now look at the results: claims of tens of thousands of ā€œcasesā€ daily. Frankly, I have no confidence in their output & neither should you. Onceā€¦

ā€¦you bring yourself to remove the labels off people & just take a long, cool look at the reality in the country. Thereā€™s just not much going on. Hospitals are less full than usual. Fewer people are dying of respiratory disease than usual. Weā€™re being badly misled. I canā€¦

ā€¦understand those running these facilities are making lots of money. But the scientists in charge must address these challenges at speed. If they donā€™t, I recommend everyone them regard their attitude not as mere stubbornness but as a malign & deliberate policy to mislead.

ā€¢ ā€¢ ā€¢

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh