>>12311634 (/lb)
Your continued attacks on Q4881 make your 'interpretation' of my 'interpretation' completely irrelevant, null and void, not factual, just your 'interpretation'.
Nice try.
Good.
Is Lin Wood….teaching Anons using his own 'namefag' credibility as a sacrifice for the greater good?
Be like Wood and admit when spreading information later realized as to be questioned is what we should all admit to having done if we did it?
He's already won.
All the noise and accusations from the media and the D's is to stop their own deaths.
Anons are Anons.
Q posts are Q posts.
Anons often do post in a hivemind. It does not prove 'conspiracy'.
Why does Q4881 trigger you?
Anons know.
Well UNLIKE Anons he is calling out certain people out BY NAME without sauce.
For instance, how exactly did he acquire the evidence he says he has about behind closed door meetings between SCOTUS judges?
Or encrypted USB data that has videos of child rape and murder committed by some 'well known names'?
I'm trying to be honest when I say that all I can do is SPECULATE' as to the ultimate truth of both the data he says he has and what he is tweeting on the basis of it.
It continues to trigger you and every other 'anon' attacking it.
You're projecting when you accuse me.
Posting a Q drop is never reasonable grounds to attack the anon who posted it.
All you're doing is proving yourself triggered by a Q drop.
I know why.
I posted it because I still see media attacks on 'Qanon'.
>we are only trying to help you understand that when asked not to use Qanon on media or SM does not mean cause division on the board with ridiculous claims of changing a banner
That sentence you wrote is what a food lawyer would call consciousness of guilt.
First, you don't speak for any "we" as against 'me'. Such pathetic sophistry is only designed to replace truth with 'consensus'.
Second, I made no mention of any 'banner'. That's all you.
Third, it is not 'causing division' to post a Q drop to anyone except ANTI-Q shills.
You do understand how that's the only way you can appear to Anons right? Accusing Q drops of dividing the people is about the dumbest most low IQ way you morons could infiltrate and attack.
You can't stop the world from uniting.
You can't stop the fact that there is no 'Qanon', that it is a media label designed to attack Q by proxy because they (you) can't stop Q.
You're going to have to keep coping. If it hurts, I know why.
Moar attacks is only moar proof Q4881 is over the target.
Kek, it is funny to watch the division shills squirm!
Those wanting to defraud the election are those who would seek to block poll watchers.
Yes, it is 'exceptionally dangerous' to criminals and election fraudsters who tried to cheat POTUS out of a re-election.
Sloppiest, biggest botch in election fraud in history, and the allies to the fraud are claiming 'it is dangerous to stop it'.
These people spreading cabal code are easily exposed as frauds themselves.
Your projecting cope is cute.
I asked two questions.
You made an attack assertion against an Anon for asking them.
You're coping, not me.
Me as well, I filter it instantly.
What gives it a telltale sign it's spam is the fact that the shill has to keep adding random characters as text in order to bypass the admin's spam filter. That shows intention to disrespect the admin's design.
By 'normalcy' they mean nwo march to destroy America's sovereignty.
Kek
You made a true statement.
Anon must have been over the target.
What are 'assets'?
Maxine got her marching order 4am talking point from her foreign handlers.
Hahaha, you're only pissed off because Patriots never give up.
All your false 'deadlines' are psyops.
The constitution only has one date, Jan 20, AMD EVEN THAT DATE CAN BE CHANGED BY CONGRESSIONAL VOTE.
There is no way to distinguish your post from a shill trying to set up Anons to be demoralized once datefagging fails.
Exactly.
How many 'Anon' failed PREDICTIONS of future happenings on specific dates based on 'Q decodes' have there been?
Way more failures than successes. In fact, I don't have even one memory of a success.