>>12395230

Exactly.

We are getting down to the point where the idea of "control" flies out the window. Unless we are such a massive group and the military can be absolutely guaranteed to not get dragged into God only knows what unfolds…

The only way this proceeds in any kind of orderly fashion is if there is some saving of the god damned day to come in from somewhere.

Otherwise, it will be down to armed militia and partisans yanking people out into the street and executing them on the spot.

We have courts for a fair trial because street justice sucks ass when you happen to get grabbed and executed for a misunderstanding.

However, when we have absolutely no justice and no system by which to pursue justice of the suspected and detained…. You can't let evil roam free.

And once that happens, "less than 10" will be at the complete mercy of the tides of humanity - whichever ways they go. Even the capital and material resources of the whole nation would pale in comparison.

>>12395342

I don't think the 'snap' will be immediate. There is a very limited window after Biden is inaugurated to act. There are a lot of questions for someone like myself to see answered.

What is the position of my local authorities? City police, county scherriff, state patrol? What about county and state levels?

Are there trustworthy groups of partisans not likely to be a clown op?

What defenses need to be taken locally - IE - local assholes calling for arrests or purges. What local targets are valid or need to be dealt with? What targets are off limits and will need to wait for greater organization or more souring of public opinion?

This is where things start to get messy. Normally, we say the person is guilty, not their family - but would you use such methods against these people - or, perhaps more accurately, how would you handle those 'among you' doing stuff like luring people with their children or family members/associates?

Do you treat them as criminals or overlook it? Can you afford to treat them as criminals and the internal friction it causes as some see it as completely acceptable to go entirely unrestricted warfare?

… And worse - if you win with such people - you know they will very likely go unrestricted warfare to see their own idea of things go through.

At the same time as I say this - Q saving the day would negate the "people can change at the precipice" idea. Meaning we…. What?

Unless the change is meant for other branches of our government, such as the states which are basically being told to go pound sand during all of this….

We are in for "interesting times" in any event.

>>12395427

That plea bargain was established between Flynn and Special Counsel Mueller's team.

I would imagine it has something to do with Mueller's investigation…. Which I have a theory about.

Mueller seemed a bit disinterested in the work of his counsel - or at least their report.

Makes me wonder what he was up to while poking around in everyone's business.