Anonymous ID: 12acd4 Jan. 11, 2021, 4:33 a.m. No.12462862   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2885 >>2902 >>3031 >>3414

>>12462838

>it’d be nice if Ron let us have Odin already.

Odin could be Gab?

Ron only posts there now and that's where everyone is flooding. Plus their huge infrastructure upgrades.

 

I don't think people will be happy with up and moving to another platform again. It took the Twitter purge to move everyone this time. And the timing lined up with the three year deltas.

 

Gab is Odin?

Anonymous ID: 12acd4 Jan. 11, 2021, 4:56 a.m. No.12463000   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3039

>>12462937

>>12462891

>but the number games are not as significant as content, logic, and reason.

 

Oh, but the number games are significant!

 

Content, logic, and reason… yes.

But you'd be surprised at how often doing a time difference on quoted Q posts leads to other directly relevant posts.

Post chains of related content. Like that one I posted. The time difference is a post about the Democrats attempting to impeach Trump again.

 

I've found countless others like this. And they're not a stretch. They're very specific.

 

It even says on the 8kun Welcome Page:

"The code is not complicated, because the target audience is YOU the worker, the family, the wonderful soul that you are."

 

Don't overcomplicate it trying to out-decode the next Anon because you may end up overlooking the obvious.

Anonymous ID: 12acd4 Jan. 11, 2021, 5:44 a.m. No.12463419   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3566

>>12463254

>Q has often mentioned to check time/date differences

>

>Indeed. Timestamps and coordination of timing were quite important to establishing the authenticity of the Q material early on.

 

So you don't realise that, although Q hasn't posted in some time, Q is foretelling specific events on specific days in the future? Proven time and again with deltas, time/date stamps and post number decodes?

 

Sure, anyone can pick an event on a particular day and then choose from almost 5000 posts to find one that matches using critical though.

But its much more jaw dropping when you realise Q posts are scheduled for specific days in the future, detailing specific events on those days. Then you try to get your head around how that is possible.

 

Sure, there's been plenty of times WE have been wrong, WE have decoded incorrectly, WE made the wrong assumptions as to what Q means and WE have made the wrong predictions.

 

WE have been wrong.

 

Not Q.

 

When has Q been wrong?