Although Barnes BRIEFLY repeated his critique of Q and anons, he did provide an objectively measured assessment of the downside of Prez Trump's approach to politics these past 4 years. Of course Barnes expresses his opinion based on those fairly objective criteria, but he does provide balance to the very positive side of the Prez's administration record. Lots of good. And lots of frustratingly off-the-mark approaches and, so results, based on a naive political management style that was too soft on establishment types.

I disagree on much of what BARNES had to say but at least he had some firsthand knowledge and a focus on substance rather than mere namecalling or ideology. About half way through he lists many of the good things he praised Prez Trump for.

https://youtu.be/v2JrEIdgpw4

Not sure that Barnes has a good grasp of the Q posts, especially regarding the deeply flawed vote counting, but he is not way off in his remarks, based on his own principles and experience. Above all, BARNES looked to results rather than just process and intentions. And, unless there is moar to Q in the coming years, his current assessment is fair enough. Like I said, I disagree with BARNES on some pretty big items but appreciate his better-than-average political consistency.

>>12641537

>>12641533

Concur, in part.

Disagree only on speed you'd get UCMJ'd.

Half a heartbeat and no chance to catch a breath.

Biden will be paranoid.

His close circle will be paranoid.

Scared of each other because paranoid.

Jumpy and unsettled and never comfy in power.

That scene was a real measure. Far more accurate than any survey or poll or focus group analysis.

>>12641577

Yes, there's some of that to take into account of what BARNES had to say about Q and his view of the case/s against the fraudulent vote counts. He is a realist and if he saw results he'd take a different view of Q and his perception of the potential Q influence on the attorneys who are working those cases.