Anonymous ID: 8d2c0b May 1, 2018, 4:59 p.m. No.1266106   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6122 >>6133

>>1265890

Exwitchfag. We have no idea if those women were witches or not. The claim that they were just wise women fits in well with a mindset that witches don't exist, but they lived in a time when people believed in witchcraft. The plotline of independent women being accused of being witches is a common, if tired, cliché in many novels but it really doesn't rest on anything but the notion that "People used to think people were witches but in our enlightened times, we know better." I was a [white] witch. Knew witches. No one mpt om the life had a clue. Because they don't exist, as we all know - right?

Anonymous ID: 8d2c0b May 1, 2018, 5:15 p.m. No.1266274   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6285 >>6332

>>1265987

If male anons can casually mention their wife without playing the boy card, we should assume anons are not trying to play the girl card by mentioning their husband. Men aren't the default - we are all equal. Expecting women to artificially mask their gender when they aren't deliberately calling attention to it doesn't advance the reason for the rule.

Anonymous ID: 8d2c0b May 1, 2018, 5:47 p.m. No.1266594   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6599

>>1266332

You make the point that merely mentioning your husband is not attention seeking or trying to call attention to your gender. It would be absurd for female anons doing good work to have to remain silent or create a male alter ego to interact online. We all despise the girls who come on here and demand attention or respect or whatever because they are female. Mentioning your husband, long hair, that you are pregnant or something that makes it easy to guess you are female is not what the rule is about and we're smart and fair minded enough to be able to figure that out.