Strangeness at SCOTUS -Expert on SCOTUS says "can't remember seeing this happen before…"

Seven of this week’s relists have something strange in common: All were considered at the court’s Jan. 8 conference and then were relisted for this Friday’s conference, but never made a stop at the intervening Jan. 15 conference. I can’t remember seeing that happen before, and certainly not to a group of cases en masse. Six of the cases all have one other thing in common: They involve former President Donald Trump or Trump administration policies that now seem likely to be discontinued or modified.

https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/01/relist-watch-165/#more-298666

>>12683897

>>12683875

>Scotus Blog is a terrible org run by activists. They aren't alarmed just curious.

What I posted was fact not opinion and why we should be curious/alarmed whatever as to why these cases aren't taking the normal path at SCOTUS. Who pointed this oddity out shouldn't matter

>>12683914

>I learned from the elections, that courts are an illusion and tool for keeping the people down last year.

I learned 7 years ago from going to a post-divorce hearing and denied all access to my children…then ex dies and fucking criminals adopt out my ADULT CHILDREN to continue their foster care fraud.

Yes, they're putting children of divorce in the foster care system for free college and foster care funds and leaving the honest/ethical parent behind

The election fraud hopefully wakes everyone up to the 'WIZARD BEHIND THE CURTAIN"

>>12683916

interesting theory. I hate these SCOTUS conferences where they vote in secret whether or not to hear a case and ZERO TRANSPARENCY OVER THIS PROCESS. Our country needs to throw out the SCOTUS rule that allows SCOTUS to have discretion in what cases are heard. WE THE PEOPLE appeal our cases to SCOTUS for a reason and if the volume of cases are too much to handle then SCOTUS needs to get to the root cause of the problem…ahem CORRUPTION IN THE LOWER COURTS….not just arbitrarily decide what 1% cases they'll hear because the volume of cases are too overwhelming.

In the Medical Appeals industry EVERY CASE IS HEARD so why is SCOTUS allowed to brush appeals under-the-rug???!!!!

>>12684005

>Roberts will throw the case out.

WE THE PEOPLE need to demand to be heard! See my rant >>12684011

>>12683977

Thank you, anon. I NEVER GIVE UP! I'm fighting more than you know for all of us!

>>12683995

>Not much media coverage on the status, hard to find updates on the web.

Here's the case page for it, anon

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/republican-party-of-pennsylvania-v-boockvar-2/

and here SCOTUS official page here:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-542.html

>>12684092

>Anons remain to fight & spread truth.

I look at us as news aggregators….pisses me off every time I see us described as 'conspiracy theorists'….yes we get wild theories some times but the way things stand there are lots of directions this saga can go in.

We should all start writing fantastic novels to pass the time but I for one like that I can come to one place and get sourced news and anons gather up Federal agency news as well.

>>12684108

My family was targeted because I was "money bags." My attorney said to me early on after a closed door conference that I wasn't privy to…."I didn't know you were money bags."

The divorce wasn't even real - I was never served summons/complaint which means the summons/complaint expired and in my State the divorce case was deemed dismissed. Everything after didn't mean shit. Here I sit though - SCOTUS didn't hear the case and meanwhile I uncovered the Foster Care Fraud - did a whistlebllower case including having attorneys….but I'm still waiting and the criminals retaliated further by black-and-white kidnapping my children through a FRAUDULENT ADOPTION of my ADULT children a little over a year ago.

I thought Q would come through for me/us and I still believe the Q team will. It's all I have left but to have faith that someone is doing something because I sure as Hell did everything I could short of taking up arms and going 'postal'.