i hear ya anon
thanks.
i dont need much
but somehow you always get enough popcorn in the like bucket to keep going.
anyway.
yea.
it is funny how it is
i always try to reinforce
all i have is a piece of the puzzle like everyone else but it seems to make the image more clear.
If you are curious.
It is interesting how sci-fi novels can begin to reflect reality.
You can look into the future. It is fun to explore how each Utopia will fade in to Dyspotia. You can figure it out. You will know their "achilles heal". You see what direction they will go, and know that is life, and eventually they will go back.
Let's take an easy example. Everyone starts homogenizing their clothes. Everyone wants to be part of American culture and quits individuating so much and creating an image with their clothes. It becomes egotistical or fake to create a personal image.
You can see the other side, the sci-fi, where everyone is wearing the same star-trek uniform.
The bluegeens and white t of the future.
It is just different garb
There will be troublemakers
People who have ego.
People who think they are better than the whole of Humanity
the children
they explore with costumes and that is fine
but when you grow up in the Republic
you have to join as a citizen
and part of that social contract
is not the disturb the peace
if everything you dress like mardi gras in the future
they put you in Earth jail for disruption
you got a revolution on your hands
over a uniform
the difference can be highlighting if you look at the caste systems of the east and compare it with the individuation of the unique snowflake in America. In between are other varying degrees of cultural vs. individual identity.
I want to be.. and see the movement of American culture shift from self-importance to group-importance.
You see how eventually that will create all kinds of fucked of dystopias?
but for now, it just where we are.
the east is westernizing, they say.
getting out of caste systems
expressing more on social media
americans can do the same in my opinion
with a bit of "easternization"
that may sound dumb
i ain't telling you to make a caste system
but
they don't have a caste system because they are backwards
they have a caste system because it was a great solution when it was created
but later began to have a negative impact
this is natural
it always happens
plenty of people will be westen unique indivdual snowfales dressing however they want and dying there hair purple.
i dont care.
it doesn't really matter
it is just a personal thing for me
i enjoy thinking
like.. okay.
what is this stuff look like?
i don't have to <becomeit.
to hypothesis about it's future
universal theologies <could they be based on the Lord if the World Prophet returns? could it take time for the rest of the world to accept Jesus as a Prophet? I think Jesus is all over the Koran and Torah though. Anyway.>
universal theology <not diety based, but what is true from the beginning to the end, what is known and not>
-quite honestly America. I do believe and faith in one Creator, the Lord, however, based on the scientific process and physical , 3D evidence, which is not everything, but, I cannot <PROVEthe Lord created the Universe. I can believe all I want but I cannot prove it in accords with the stands of a Universal Culture>
Universal Theology
Universal Language <not english>
-english is most common, but is not the "best"
-it is too far in one direction between the arabic/chinese syle and the russian/european style.
-you are looking for Romance languages, but you have to romance a bit further back than the Romance of the a BRANCH of language, but if you trace that language tree back.
To make a proper Universal Language, based on science of language vs. which language dominates the economic structure)
Okay. English is fine. But you have to fix the syntax. I know how to do it. I made peace for everyone with it. It sounds like stupid people talk. It is like caveman english in a way.
try it. you can do it naturally. it may sound stupid. but it is actually functional. pretend you are chinese. but speak english
your syntax won't be so… twisty as I call it
big words create twists/turns which are viewed as intentional manipulations when viewed properly in translation. Translation does not apply social context, it just translates the meaning of the word to an earlier time in history, and then back to the relevant language.
so english latin > hebrew > sanskrit > aramaic > i dunno > whatever