dChan
Anonymous ID: 3a5952 Feb. 1, 2021, 6:43 p.m. No.12795333   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>12795238

 

I can see fours sets of Two of the same birds heading in the same direction towards the set of 5 planes

 

BASCO11

Hex: AE4D67 Share

 

Reg.:10-0214

United States

Type:C17

Boeing C-17A Globemaster III

Type Desc.:L4J

Squawk:

Anonymous ID: 3a5952 Feb. 1, 2021, 7:12 p.m. No.12795611   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5669

Narrative Reframes,

Understand that Narrative Warfare and PsyOps can be legally conducted in America since the 2012 NDAA. These cognitive tactics are sophisticated and government orchestrated, and meant to placate you to the narrative which causes detriment to proper decision-making faculties in alignment with your personal values. It is an insidious minimization of the individual tactic which causes the person to normalize a narrative they would otherwise be against, in order to prevent ostracism or dehumanization. To understand how this was discretely accomplished through ambiguous legislation, which has been grossly exploited, please watch this short video.

1:47 mins

https://t.me/NarrativeReframes/96

Anonymous ID: 3a5952 Feb. 1, 2021, 7:15 p.m. No.12795638   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Narrative Reframes, [01.02.21 22:07]

Legalized here in 2012, just like they did in multiple other places.

 

“Defense systems (technological and psychological) can be overwhelmed by fear, by cognitive overload, and by the contextual distortion of a weaponized narrative.

 

We can erode the will of our enemies, contain their influence, and dominate the narrative space from micro to macro. “

 

Ajit Maan, PhD., Affiliate Faculty, George Mason University

 

Article excerpt from 2018:

 

“State sponsorship of information operations, psychological operations, [and] cyber attacks to maintain spatial displacement from lethal activity are outpacing us.

 

DoD suggests the hyperconnectivity and weaponization of information are, in part, responsible for the post-primacy status of liberal democratic systems.

The commitment of liberal democratic societies to free speech and open information exchange has been turned against us by societies that don’t value or practice the same ideals themselves.

 

[Risk assessment: https://acqnotes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/DoD-Risk-Mgt-Guide-v7-interim-Dec2014.pdf]

 

Narrative is central to cognition. Weaponized narrative represents a deep threat to national and international security and cooperation—a threat that our advanced kinetic capacity, and those of our partner nations, cannot address alone. When narratives are weaponized, they can undermine homeland security by shaking the faith of citizens in democratic institutions.

 

Narratives do not tell the facts. Narratives tell the meaning of the facts. This is narrative warfare, and our adversaries are beating our brawn with their brains.

 

We do not have an influence containment strategy; we need one. However, containment of adversarial influence is not the best we can do. We can do better than that through our improved capacities to influence the domestic populations of our adversaries and the opinions of the international community represented by organizations such as the United Nations.

Narrative is the power shifter. Those who understand narrative and how to employ it need to be invited into this fight and to lead it. The military has been receptive to anthropological studies of specific conflict zones which is, of course, crucial but now more than ever we need people who understand how brains work—not just the brains of our adversaries but also our own. This is not just a fight between truth and lies. It is a fight over meaning and identity—the meaning of the truth and the meaning of the lies. We need to focus on what kinds of identities layers (personal through national) are being constructed by both and which identities are being undermined.

 

A comprehensive narrative strategy will exploit adversarial weaknesses and mitigate adversarial strengths on the level of influence.

 

However, just one narrative is not enough.

 

Multi-level narratives, from meta to strategic to tactical will be necessary for maximum effect.

 

Metanarrative will influence the perceptions of the international community by framing the big picture in a way that exploits the contradictions between Russia’s walk and talk, and detail the implications of that disjunct for the international community. Strategic-level narratives will comprehensively determine our actions. Tactical, ground-level narratives will erode the confidence of the native populations of our adversary. “

 

View entire Narrative Warfare article: https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2018/02/27/narrative_warfare_113118.amp.html

 

https://t.me/NarrativeReframes/97