sheep.
>>1285181 is right.
Driving has a specific meaning in law.
Just cause the 'court' says something does not make it so. You're not really interested in fixing this nation when you take positions like this.
I never said it would work. It is exactly the same thing as trying to convict the queen of a crime in her court. it won't ever work. The court does not follow the written law. I agree it won't work. It's like trying to start a gasoline engine when the there isn't any piston in it. You have to shit can the entire thing and replace it with something that is not corrupt. The court is a huge part of the problem.
UCC
Commerce Clause corruption and meaning stretching.
It's all rotten.
which doesn't apply to US Citizens cause US Citizens are collateral to the US Corp for its debt.
The court knows this but wont tell you. Common law does not apply in a UCC corporate court.
Sheep.
Must live in the UK and think that fella that flipped of the traffic cam deserved the state pitching him in the clink for 8 months is a great thing.
Play chess, play football, box, play baseball, doesn't matter.
The question is, do you intend to win or lose the match?
You're chess strategy looks like you're throwing the game. On purpose? Do you know? Do they know? Does anyone care? Does anyone wear underwear?
Heh, fuck it. At some point the law of diminishing returns kicks in. Cloak and dagger shit can only be taken so far before it all becomes the joke that it is.