Anonymous ID: c33a3e May 3, 2018, 7:25 a.m. No.1285544   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1284928 (prev.)

>it was always supposed to be that way

true, true

>anons were always supposed to contribute notables to the BAKER

>some anons got lazy

>some anons forgot

>some anons never knew

>I think it's a great idea

>just wasn't sure of what the TAG TEAM NOTABLES' label was supposed to mean

>after all it was the night shift crew, and we all know they are a little different

yeah, i guess we can loose the TAG eventually/soon, but felt like leaving it for a while would help spread knowledge of the method...

personally i loved every moment baking, but keeping an eye on the thread count while watching for heads up (and selecting and writing the titles because anons don't do it) gets intense - and if Q drops on top of that, even moar of a rush...

CoBaking settles that, then you can concentrate on the posts and Q, while anons concentrate on the thread/notables

Anonymous ID: c33a3e May 3, 2018, 8:12 a.m. No.1285863   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1285840

by the way, if the [markers] analyzing anon is around: i don't think you should focus on the posts where Q says marker, but the posts containing the markers he's refering to…