>>12861723 The ludicrousness of the fake Biden admin simply can not continue. Even if no one lifted a finger, the entire farcical gig is going to collapse upon itself. But I do not think for a minute that our side is finished. They are loaded up now for a major combination. Anything and everything may come out in the peach mint farce. And the SC is about to come into the game on the 19th.
>>12861949 Will add that Trump went out of his way at the border Alamo talk, to state that the 25th Amendment WILL come back to bite the Biden "administration." And since the perps as a group do not have much time to run their gig, we might expect Biden to be out very, very quickly, with the creature Harris installed for the last few days or weeks. What a loser she is. Could not even get 1% of the dem primary vote, but "they" had already selected it to play this role.
>>12862040 Yes, a March 4 inauguration of DJT would be mighty fine, and is indeed possible. But it is not a do or die date. For one thing, there have been several prior inaugurals, before the unconstitutional 20th Amendment, where the inaugural was held on a the 5th, because the 4th was on a Sunday.
Aside from that, getting Trump acknowledged is huge, but only part of the battle. They cheated across the board, down to the local level, just about everywhere. This can only be addressed with new elections, fairly conducted.
>>12862078 Get bent, idiot.
>>12862080 Maybe that was because the word spread about the vile things she did in CA, keeping the cannabis slaves in the prison plantation. And nobody ever did bring up about the private police force she had created.
>>12862123 They could have used a freaking mannequin for that lame photo op.
>>12862137 No one date fagged, asshole.
>>12862162 A date fag makes SUPPOSITIONS about what might happen at some future point. Nothing wrong with that, but that is not even what is going on, which is the stating of FACTS about this or that. KYS
His prayer: O Lord Satan, guide me through the coming brouhaha where they remove me from my fake office. Then reward me like you promised, right? Satan? Satan?
>>12862245 You see, it was "on accident."
We had no idea, NONE, why they asked us for sensitive data and them gave us big checks.
>>12862284 Hey, Wang, what good are those highways and bridges and skyscrapers going to do you when it all collapses, and China reverts to rice growing peasants?
>>12862361 But it is necessary, because what happens next will play out in that context.