Some Thoughts on Lady Diana Spencer, Princess of Wales

Inspired by: >>12923772 (pb). Note that I am unable to answer the questions that Q poses about Diana, and that my contributions here actually make the questions he asks much harder to come up with meaningful solutions to; regardless, it is important to follows the facts.

Wall of text incoming. tl;dr, Diana seems likely to have been Cabal from the start, although I cannot even begin to comprehend what all of this really means.

A few thoughts on Diana (all emphasis mine, my editorial comments in [square brackets]):

Some Facts

1) The Spencers are part of the British elite with long-established, intimate connections to the royals.

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana%2C_Princess_of_Wales

[Check out that birth date: July the 1st 1961 (7/1 or 1/7, and 1+9+6+1=17). Two 17s; that's pretty interesting.]

"Diana was born into the British nobility and grew up close to the royal family on their Sandringham estate… The Spencer family had been closely allied with the British royal family for several generations; Diana's grandmothers … served as ladies-in-waiting to Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother."

How likely is it that her ancestors and elders, and even Diana herself, didn't know what was really going on when they were this close?

2) Winston Churchill was also a Spencer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencer_family

"Two prominent members of the family during the 20th century were Sir Winston Churchill and Diana, Princess of Wales."

The unelected PM of Britain during WW2 is very unlikely to have not been an 'insider'.

3) Diana was named after another Lady Diana Spencer from the 18th Century. The two women's lives share many details, some of them quite specific and unlikely to be coincidental.

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana_Russell,_Duchess_of_Bedford

Some other interesting details about the 'original' Diana:

• She was born on the 31st and died on the 27th. Both 'significant' numbers.

• She was an orphan who died young following the deaths of two children. Childhood trauma in the form of parental death, dead children and early deaths are all characteristic of Cabal members.

• She was supposed to marry the Prince of Wales, but did not due to political manoeuvring by the George II allies. The marriage was seemingly pitched to the heavily-indebted King on the basis of a large dowry payment.

• When she did marry another man, her total dowry (including inheritance) was £130,000.

• After her death, her grandmother burned all of her correspondence and blamed the 'back-up' husband, whose political fortunes declined considerably afterwards. Despite Diana being her 'favourite grandchild', the grandmother seemed more concerned with the girl's jewels, demanding them back even before her funeral.

• A direct quote from the article: "Victoria Massey, biographer of the earlier Lady Diana Spencer, noted the similarities between the lives of the two namesakes: as children, they both lived at Althorp and socialised with royalty; both grew up without a mother from the age of six; both were proposed as a bride for a Prince of Wales; both had an accident during their first pregnancy; and both died unexpectedly at a young age." [Coincidences, coincidences.]

4) Her elder brother died shortly after birth, her parents divorced, and she had an unstable, unhappy childhood.

All hallmarks of Cabal connection.

5) Details of her early life have resonances with locations and activities which may indicate a Cabal connection. She also seems emotionally unstable and accident-prone.

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana%2C_Princess_of_Wales#Education_and_career

"After attending Institut Alpin Videmanette [many royal and elite-connected alumnae, now closed] (a finishing school in Rougemont [red hill], Switzerland) for one term … In London, she took an advanced cooking course, but seldom cooked for her roommates [foodstuffs are major Cabal comms codewords; if she liked cooking enough to take an advanced course, why would she not cook more? Why was this fact made public?]. She took a series of low-paying jobs; she worked as a dance instructor for youth [children] until a skiing accident [search qresear.ch for "ski resort"] caused her to miss three months of work. She then found employment as a playgroup pre-school assistant [children again], did some cleaning work for her sister Sarah and several of her friends [why would a wealthy girl do this?], and acted as a hostess at parties [what kind of 'parties'?]. She spent time working as a nanny [more children] for the Robertsons, an American family living in London, and worked as a nursery teacher's assistant [even more children] at the Young England School [Y] in Pimlico."

1/3

>>12928560 (Me)

6) Although lacking any 'smoking guns, some details of her courtship and marriage are also interesting in light of all that we've learned here.

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana%2C_Princess_of_Wales#Marriage

"… Diana first met Charles … when she was 16 [legal in the UK, but only just] … He was then dating her older sister. … The relationship progressed when he invited her aboard the royal yacht …" [yachting connection, see CDAN for why this is possibly relevant].

"At the altar, Diana inadvertently reversed the order of Charles's first two names, saying "Philip Charles" Arthur George instead [word games and linguistic tricks are another perennial Cabal favourite; legally and possibly religiously, she may not have married Charles]. She did not say she would "obey" him; that traditional vow was left out at the couple's request [possible social-engineering connection], which caused some comment at the time."

"12 weeks into the pregnancy[,] Diana fell down a staircase at Sandringham, … Diana later confessed that she had intentionally thrown herself down the stairs because she was feeling "so inadequate"." [deliberate pre-birth trauma for William?]

Connected to this, it seems (to me, at least), very unlikely that someone as important as the ostensible heir to the British throne would be allowed to marry some random outsider who knew nothing of their activities.

7) She seemingly committed serial infidelity throughout her marriage. This was widely reported in the media.

Regardless of the reason, this is not the behaviour of the 'angel' she was later made out to be, and has Cabal-like undertones. The media (which is controlled) would not have reported it without 'permission' from the royals, and the disclosures would hurt the family as much as Diana. This has the smell of social engineering (modelling marital infidelity to young women).

8) Her public activities have many similarities to those of known Cabal members and connections to some of their organisations, including multiple connections to the Red Cross. She received many awards from such organisations.

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana%2C_Princess_of_Wales#Public_life

See the article, many connections to religious leaders, charities, children's hospitals, global elites (she had a 'personal relationship' with Mother Theresa), and other 'Cabal-related' people/organisations. She was involved in 'normalising ' HIV/AIDs, which is suspected to originate with the Cabal. Her connection to landmines is also interesting in light of Kamala Harris's recent comments (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/harris-says-west-virginia-must-reclaim-abandoned-land-mines).

2/3

>>12928560 (Me)

>>12928589 (Me)

9) After her divorce, she dropped many connections to charities, but retained others, including those with known Cabal connections. She also retained connections to possible 'insiders'.

"The day after her divorce, she announced her resignation from over 100 charities and retained patronages of only six: Centrepoint, English National Ballet, Great Ormond Street Hospital, The Leprosy Mission, National AIDS Trust, and the Royal Marsden Hospital [do we really believe ANY of these aren't deeply compromised?]. She continued her work with the British Red Cross Anti-Personnel Land Mines Campaign, but was no longer listed as patron.

In May 1997, Diana opened the Richard Attenborough Centre for Disability and the Arts in Leicester, after being asked by her friend Richard Attenborough [brother of climate-change shills David Attenborough; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Attenborough - check out the ages of the Jewish refugee girls his family 'took in'].

10) Post-divorce, she allegedly retained good relations with the Queen, and was publically connected to prominent Muslims.

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana%2C_Princess_of_Wales#Personal_life_after_divorce

If she was fleeing people she had recently discovered to be cannibals, it seems unlikely that she would remain on good terms with them. It is also doubtful that ANY prominent wealthy Muslims in Britain are unconnected to the Cabal; remember that the family publicly claims to be descended from their paedophile 'prophet' (May he Writhe Forever in Hell being Raped by Pigs). It also seems unlikely that an 'enemy' of the royals who had embarrassed them in the past such as Mohammad al-Fayad (who incidentally had family connections to the Kashoggis) would be allowed to not only remain alive and un-smeared, but as owner of some of the world's foremost 'brands'; I believe it likely that he was used as some sort of controlled opposition, although to what end I cannot even begin to speculate.

11) Her death was on the 31st of August and was both public and VERY high-profile. Her death and funeral were huge global events that made a major impact on many people's minds. Her death, and the associated controversy, also reflect poorly on the royals (I certainly never looked at them the same way again, and I can't be the only one).

31 is a mirrored 13. The whole thing comes across as possibly trauma-based mind control. Not necessarily incriminating for Diana, but I personally doubt that these sick, stupid people leave anything to chance (I rather suspect that almost every detail of their plan was written a LONG time ago, and they're not great at improvisation), and the former Princess of Wales seems almost perfect as a victim for such an operation. Also, no matter whether she'd run and who she ran with, it seems unlikely that the royals couldn't have arranged to have her quietly done away with; given what we know about body-doubles, they could also probably have 'replaced' her; MKUltra/Monarch-style interventions would also be possible - all of these would have looked better for the royals' images.

12) She was married to Charles for fifteen years, and divorced him nearly a year before her death.

How likely is it that either:

A) She was unaware of the royals' evil activities for all of this time despite living with them and being married to one. (Assuming she wasn't aware of them long before that).

B) She was fine with all of it for 15-16 years (or her whole life), and only after an arbitrarily long time decided she had to run.

Not very, methinks.

3/4

>>12928560 (Me)

>>12928589 (Me)

>>12928624 (Me)

Speculative Conclusions

• Given her multitude of connections, both family and personal, and the details of her life, it is almost inconceivable that Diana was not an 'insider' - at least at some level.

• For a member of such a storied elite family, with generational and personal connections to the royals, it seems very unlikely that she would have been unaware of what the elites get up to in their spare time.

• Her life contains details that indicate that it is possible that her 'life story' was pre-planned.

• If she did discover something that made her feel the need to divorce Charles after 15 years and then run for her life almost a year later, why did this discovery take her so long to make?

It is my personal conclusion that Diana was a member of the cabal, was aware of and participated in their activities, and was presumably chosen as a sacrificial victim long before she died - possibly even before she was born. I believe it is possible that the whole circumstances of her death, and perhaps even her entire life, were some sort of Cabal psy-op aimed at social engineering and trauma-based mind control.

A Final Thought

If Diana really was Cabal, but was also really WAS running after discovering something horrible; this leaves a huge question: What kind of discovery frightens a child-raping cannibal Satanist enough to induce her to run for her life?

Thank you for your time.

4/4

>>12929070

>Queen isn't as evil as they come.