Im using 50% and 12% I should be in the clear.
You dont need a milling machine. A drill and router work just fine.
An end mill is a cutter it goes in a rotating tool holder. All mine were lost in a boating accident.
Any stout drill press with work. I would not use a hand drill except if its a polymer unit. The gig is useful but I mad a few just using my milling vice. Once you get the first cut around the wall you can free hand the rest.
That's the jig I have. But I only use the drill hole guide and the pocket outline. After .25 inch cut for the control pocket only use the two side to hold the lower.
In reality neither an AR-15 lower or upper when separated is a firearm . There have been at least 7 court cases that have determined that. If you store you ARs separated then you never have a gun that could be confiscated if some comes knocking.
looks like its a fag storm
I think we are on the same side but if you want me to show you that you are wrong I will.
Nicolaysen argued that the definition of a receiver under the relevant federal code differed in various ways from the AR-15 component Roh was accused of manufacturing.
Under the US Code of Federal Regulations, a firearm frame or receiver is defined as: “That part of a firearm which provides housing for the hammer, bolt or breechblock, and firing mechanism, and which is usually threaded at its forward portion to receive the barrel.” (emphasis added)
The lower receiver in Roh’s case does not have a bolt or breechblock and is not threaded to receive the barrel, Nicolaysen noted.
And neither does any other AR-15 lower receiver. Where most firearms have a monolithic receiver that meets the definition under federal law, an AR has a split receiver, an upper and a lower. Neither component, strictly speaking, meets the definition of a frame or receiver that is explicitly laid out in the law.
In effect, Nicolaysen argued that the ATF’s interpretation of federal law that they’ve been using to deem AR-15 lowers as legal firearms is wrong…and has been since, well, forever.
(Nicolaysen) called the decision to classify it as a firearm nonetheless, the result of “secret, in-house decision-making.”
Nicolaysen accused the ATF of abusing its authority by pursuing Roh based on his alleged violation of a policy “that masquerades as law.”
Roh’s case was heard in a bench trial (at his option) in which only the judge hears the evidence and renders a verdict. US District Court Judge James V. Selna deliberated for a year and then wrote a tentative order in April.
In his order, Selna agreed with Roh’s argument that the ATF’s definition of an AR-15 lower as a firearm is faulty.
The decision prompted Lynch to write that if the ATF wants an AR-15 lower receiver to be considered a firearm under the law, then it should pursue "regulatory or administrative action." But there's no public record of the ATF taking such a step.
But in an AR-15, the receiver is split into upper and lower parts — and some of the components listed in the definition are contained in the upper half. That has led judges to rule that a lower receiver alone cannot be considered a gun. The lower receiver sits above the pistol grip, holds the trigger and hammer, and has a slot for the magazine.
Go to prison for what?
I think someone did show you the law and you can go and read numerous cases around 80% lowers, to date no one has be imprisoned over a legal 80% lower. In fact you can build any gun you want and its legal. Just get the proper tax stamps or paperwork for SBRs.
Wrong, are you just fucking retarded or a gooberment employee which then the answer to the first part would be a YES.
Well since there are 196 videos on you tube showing how to make a AR-15 lower I would say there is ZERO chance of anything being shutdown over it, but here this is for you…