>>12943802 (pb)
if you eat stuff too, obviously you get the nutrients in the food.
if you fast , which means no food, and only drink distilled water . . . that is when you have the issue that I discuss about having cognitive issues.
see this:
if you fast, you should not JUST drink distilled water.
you can 'starve' your brain as well as your body.
if you have food and drink distilled?
I don't have any issues with that.
when I say 'if you just drink distilled water' you aren't seeing that I also caveot that with 'and also fast (no food)'
so I don't disagree with you.
fear porn
it will be interesting to compare the response in Wisconson to the response of when Mr. Trump was in Wisconson.
will the 'Italian bloodlines' anon from last night post a long exposes, with blood colors, about other ethnicities? List all the 'families' of the East? or of Central Asia and how they all connect?
the 'bloodline' expose seemed absent in some various issues of history.
it didn't seem to get that Italy was not a unified nation. It seemed to ignore very many different noble families, of the north, and it glossed over other issues about piracy and a constant need for vigilance.
It seemed to ignore a lot of various topics.
anyway, that it was all presented in a pink text on a bloodred paper was reason enough for me to say 'too much too fast.'
and pan it.
but maybe a read of it will help, there was too much all at once, too much to down load, not concise, coudl have been a pdf.
it's useful to know what other people want to pass off as 'facts'.
ignoring various part of important History, for me, is a tell that the release of it by whoever did it was a 'propaganda' drop.
anon presents a point of view that allows others to say 'you're an idiot'
"there is no room at the Inn, GOOD!" anon tries an old favorite troll.
I must have misinterpreted you.
I thought you were saying that people who were shivering in the cold should be shut out onto the street by a boarding house that charges a price-gouger's rate.
as far as the 'travellors' from central America go: they should be put up by the consulates of their respective countries. The people who finacned them , and the service agencies that 'service' them when the arrive should be put up on charges of human trafficking.
the welfare dollars should be cut off.
and all the officers of the non profits that fester and thrive on the 'servicing' of foreign invaders for a free life here: they should be audited and their assets considered for forfiture.
hows that for harsh?
but meanwhile if people are shivering, and you can see it, there is a moral obligation to help them.
sad that you have this 'game' attitude as if being civil and real, and human, is like shooting a basket or getting a boubie prize.
you get right to the tranny-cuddle.
you must love that really, that's what you always go back to.
So if you see a straggler in the cold rain shivering, I'm not saying you have to pick them up and cuddle them. I'm saying you need to get htem help. Usually that involves sending the police to do a wellness check.
but you love that sexualize it all, always bring it back to that.
so I know you are just a troll.
the phrasing used is to smear the board.
anon brings it to a violent conclusion and the purpose of such narratives is obvious.
your musings are purposefully violent in order to draw scrutiny to this board.
reminder: it's just you, anon. you're speaking to the wind.
trolling for scrutiny by three letter dark-ops?
does he include that as a qualification.
why are you playing with this one?
did you read what he said?
you still aren't understanding what I'm saying.
but that's fine because I stated it clearly so I have to say you purposefully are misunderstanding just to get more ( yo u's)
another one who isn't hearing my point and bringing it to some strange world place where everyone else is a 'violator' and they are doing 'last stand' boast shaming.
it's a troll.
it's all part of the 'we will fight and be as mean as we want' trolling as if MAGA people are suddenly callow and don't care about human decency.
see how low this anon gets with it: they are camping on his lawn.
no they aren't.
and if they do turn on the sprinklers.
why would people want to do what shouldn't be allowed?
it's just as questionable to ban a 'leftist' from speaking as it is to ban any one else.
the gaming of energy allows the pig-at-the troth 'manger' classes to game the delivery.
a more likely explanation is that this grid failure is a purposeful failure manufactured through the intentional neglect of the systems of delivery, both neglect to plain for the future and neglect to do maintenance.
I have heard of towns that are fully owned by one family (with an obvious name) hidden in full view.
no, that would work BUT
you would have to have 100 amp service.
and then just barely.
but what a real deal for that is:
you would shut off the heater or turn it low if you aren't in the room.
so you would have 7 heaters, one for each room. But only in the room you are in do you turn it up all the way.
all 7 won't be a 1750 watts!
'electric car' in an ice storm is a death sentence in a rural place.
rural places need gasoline!
and ice-fishing shanties for winter food harvasting!
tell that to someoen who lives in the forest when there is 6 feet of snow on all the roads.
the motor will run a lot longer with gasoline than with a 'charge'.
once the battery gets too cold it behaves oddly.
live at the end of a long dirt road in a rural place.
you need to have a gasoline powered vehicle.
a snow machine, a motor scooter.
nothing with a battery is going to do you much good when the temperature goes too low.
it's a life or death situation.
in a city, where the grid is redundant,than I get it. Electric cars for the short deal in the down town.
but if you are travelling on the open highway, and going the distance, electric cars are a major hinderance.
and if it's sub zero, it's life or death.
the car heater keeps you alive.
you are a propagandist for the electical energy cartels.
the people who are doing the 'rolling' shold be put under hard scrutiny.
perhpas the management of the grid needs to be given to the Army Corp.
troll shill, it's a long way to the ocean from Aspen.
so you grew up where it's easy and you must be a rich person.
if you really grew up in the rockies then you would understand that sometimes the gas motor is the only method.
so I call fraud on you.
I think that for one use, or the other, you pick whas makes sense for the place that the device is used.
if it's a city, electric cars are convenient.
if you need to go a long way, you get a gas powered one.
if you want a cold weather vehicle, you get a gas powered one.
in a rural environment, you get a gas powered one for long trips.
on a golf course, electric makes more sense.
for a lake top, a snow machine probably is better with gasoline to power it.
there is no 'one answer'
only the patent mongers and the energy-supply gamers and profiteers would say 'you should only use this tech, and nothing else.'
2 feet of snow buries it all and then it produces nothing.