Anonymous ID: 06e71e Feb. 17, 2021, 11:35 p.m. No.12979611   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9652

Anyone frequent this site?

https://www.metabunk.org/forums/

I've only been checking it over for perhaps less than an hour, but it seems to be the most sincere attempt to rationally critique some of the claims made by "our side" that I"ve seen.

It seems to be run by this guy Mick West, apparently a former video game programmer and now a full-time "debunker". He seems to be a pretty smart guy (very different from fake experts like Mike Rothschild), but if you read his posts closely, you can see some gaps in his thinking. For instance, in discussing the oft-repeated quote attributed to William Casey that "we'll know we've succeeded when everything they believe is false", Mr. West takes as evidence against its authenticity that it would be nearly logically impossible for that particular situation to ever be literally true… well, yes, and grasping that is a sign that West is fairly smart, but such logical insight counts very little (for me) as evidence against Casey actually saying that.

 

There are a number of mentions of "QAnon" and even a few QAnon themed threads, but I see no attempt to "debunk" QAnon directly (and in particular no attempt to debunk the claim that the Q op worked in tandem with the Trump White House).

 

Could be an interesting place to review or even participate…

Anonymous ID: 06e71e Feb. 17, 2021, 11:56 p.m. No.12979701   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9715

>>12979652

>He's a glownigger

Why are you sure of this?

In my somewhat cursory review of the site, I didn't see any personal attacks, and indeed in his "welcome message" Mick West quite specifically points out that such things are to be logically rejected.

This doesn't mean that I think he is "right", just that he SEEMS to be acting sincerely. I can well envision such a character type as I used to read "debunker" literature myself… I learned a lot from Martin Gardner, for instance.

 

In any case, I suspect the site would be less useful as a way to engage others than as a source of what could be some of the possibly best CRITICISMS from outsiders.

NOT everything put forward by our side is logically cogent… and sometimes actual anons get frustrated when trying to critique "our team".

Anonymous ID: 06e71e Feb. 18, 2021, 12:25 a.m. No.12979796   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12979715

>you will see George Washington University

kek… did that decades back..

did a summer program and did some PCR and learned to add dry ice to snap cap test tubes with water…

Anonymous ID: 06e71e Feb. 18, 2021, 12:43 a.m. No.12979857   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12979798

>Remember the last post by Q? "We're Not Gonna Take It"

nothing else that I would rather do?

I could quibble…

but I remember years ago being on a bus all night and listening to Twisted Sister and then we got to Niagara Falls as dawn broke and it was awesome!

(seriously, it was way better than expected)