>In position & ready to survive the Apocalypse.
>How about you?
Writing an Apocalypse for my own survival
>My kid told me he will be the first human to kill demons (when he was 4!)
Based
Race to the finish line?
>Experts say flu rates hit a record low in 2020, thanks to COVID precautions
What an utterly flagrant bunch of faggots
>Good luck and God speed anon
Will be praying for all our protection
I'm about to cannonball into a den of snakes
o7
This was my favorite review of the day:
The Nuremberg Code
1) The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2)The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3) The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4) The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5) No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the
experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6)The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7) Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8) The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9)During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
10) During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
["Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10", Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.]
https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Nuremberg+Code
It's pretty clear we need to explicitly make it known that we DO NOT CONSENT
>Absolutely, if this is all some kind of experiment I DO NOT CONSENT AND WANT IT TO STOP.
>The risks of injury, disability and death, to our whole society, is off the chart. Just say’n
It's so crazy to even think how many violations are plain as day. And this is a KNOWN standard that has been well-established.
The one that really jumped out immediately at me, probably because myself and MANY others have endured SEVERE mental suffering (some going as far as to take their own LIFE… R.I.P.) throughout this little "experiment", was
>4) The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
Again, something many experts have warned about pertaining to both lockdowns, masks, and moar. Yet, those who chose to wield such powers to conduct such "experiments" as they did violated damn near every point made in this specific Code, established for standards of conduct.
There was force. There was fraud. Deceit. Duress may be debatable, but the power was clearly "over-reaching".
We were never given the duration, nor were we given ANY of the factual information. No formal disclosure of risks associated. Most of us never openly gave our consent. Perhaps, the mask was used to ACT as a sign of "consent", but we were never even given the risks associated with that. Beyond deceitful, fully comfortable saying criminally negligent practices.
I could break every last relevant point down, but just reading this makes A LOT basically self-evident.
>2)The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
Crashing the entire economy and permanently traumatizing children because someone was afraid of a mutated strain of the common cold…
So, they just tried one thing and another, never bothering to really stop half of the ineffective insanity because…? Shit was totally random AF and not based upon any serious amount of factual information what-so-ever. At best they can try to play it off as following "expert advice", which is no better than opinion or belief. And, oh that's right, there is that clause which explicitly states:
>It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
I love the smell of Military tribunals in the morning…
>Few other options out of this situation that wouldn’t at least appear Biblical.
Indeed
>They're not doing it voluntarily.
This is the part where it gets genuinely disturbing.
Obviously there are some there are some that are beyond threatened into the situation. Fucking disturbing AF, to say the very least.
There are other scenarios where psychological coercion is employed to willingly get them to give "consent". "Grooming" is the name sometimes given to it, and I would readily argue that description extremely softens the severity. It is no different than indoctrination, which is easily arguably brainwashing. Fucking clown shit, for sure.
Shit definitely falls into the realms of psychology. But nobody needs a degree to learn how to train a dog using tricks and treats. No pun intended, but this may or may not have shits to do with those dog comms. Just growing up with dude-bros present in society, I cannot tell you how many guys use these types of mind games with explicit intent on getting a piece. Not trying to be a hater. Just pretty fucking obvious.
Before even getting into incentives of money or fame, or whatever, there is still more indoctrination that comes long before any jon comes into the picture. Children have been hyper-sexualized at younger and younger ages. Obviously, an agenda. One that results in a mass "grooming" of society, if you wanna try to put the sugar-coating back on to make the clowns feel better about brainwashing humanity. This definitely puts the additional "willingly" in the "against their will". It's really fucked up because this is how girls think they have to act to get attention. And because their is so much goddam porn, most literally will have to act like this to get guys attention. Cause otherwise, these boys are spending all day fappin' on the interwebs to pretty an entire world of porn.
Then, you get into the psychology of a female, who now feels inadequate, because there are so many hot chicks on the interwebs, obviously everyday-betty is not going to compete with high quality photo-shops of supermodels and facades and the whole shabang. So, everyday-betty has to constantly feel bad about her appearance and actions and all the other drama stirred up by the savage world of the circus. So, yeah. Getting attention sometimes comes with that "willingness" to cross a few lines. Fucked up…
Then you get into the aspect of financial well-being. There are multiple factors here. First, because "muh women's rights", many of these girls/young females are basically forced start working well before the age of 18. Pretty much any job a teenager will be employed at does not pay jack shit to do much of anything in life. We all know this, but whatever. This is supposed to be "incentive" to go to college, which the jobs that are available clearly make such "education" very hard to afford. So, thanks to "muh women's rights", not only are these young females basically forced to wage-slave for the beast, but if they want out of that arrangement then they either have to jump immediately into debt, or start looking for a guy who has enough money to play sugar daddy. "Luckily", that young female has been "groomed" from such a young age to imagine that prince charming will come to the rescue.
Only in reality, all the guys who would typically be well suitors for the otherwise beautiful girl, had we not exposed each and every last dude-bro to idolized their supermodels. Now, creating unreasonable standards for both counterparts to hold one another to in life, there still is the issue about how of how "muh women's rights" pretty much required magic jobs to appear out of thin air. So, all of these otherwise fine young dude-bros typically aren't going to have any money unless they become drug dealers or pimps. Both are fairly well-paying jobs, and considering the alternative is go into several tens of thousands of dollars worth of debt just to wage-slave years to try and pay that debt off. So, whoever said "crime doesn't pay" never had to wage-slave for years just to go into debt to wage-slave for moar, with pretty much no chance of getting any action along the way. Especially since most young men cannot wage slave enough to actually afford a beautiful female counterpart of a similar age
This is where shit gets even moar fucked up. Because now you have grown-up dude-bros with plenty of money (many with families, too), who can very easily afford the sugar daddy role. The liberal mind will assure you, this is "good" for these young women to get "the experience". This is because the liberals are retarded as shit and do not pay TF attention to what actually happens in reality, because their brains run on LITERAL unicorn queefs.
This does not even take into account what happens should that young female meet an ACTUAL Prince irl. At which point her fate may have been far safer with the everyday pimp on the street. But we all love our fairy tale endings, don't we?