Anonymous ID: ce2175 May 4, 2018, 6:15 p.m. No.1302562   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2577

Chuck Ross

‏ @ChuckRossDC

3h3 hours ago

 

FBI Has Not Requested Strzok And Page's Personal Emails Despite Evidence They Were Used For Gov't Business

 

When do we get some evidence that "Trust Wray" still applies?

Anonymous ID: ce2175 May 4, 2018, 6:35 p.m. No.1302853   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2924 >>2949

>>1302688

"

« FBI & DOJ Criminal Conspiracy to Unseat President Trump

The True Purpose of the Progressives »

Title 1 FISA Warrant Stripped Trump of All Rights

 

February 6, 2018 by Jack

th-2

Andrew-McCabe-640x480

10552584_555712877887749_8690426174360038595_n

th-1

th-1

th

COMMON SENSE: Carter Page was a volunteer for the Trump campaign for a month or two—that’s all—but the FISA warrant against him was a Title 1 Warrant and not a Title 7 Warrant. The difference between the two is staggering.

 

A Title 7 Warrant allows the government to surveil the subject, based on incidental contact with someone suspected of being a foreign spy. Thus, the intrusion into the American’s life is limited.

 

A Title 1 FISA Warrant is completely different, and this is the one that was sought and obtained. It assumes the subject, Carter Page, was a spy working for a foreign government, and it allows the government to strip him, and everybody in his world, including Donald Trump, of their 4th Amendment right to “unlawful search and seizure.”

 

This means the Obama administration’s FBI and DOJ, based on the fraudulent Steele Dossier, was able to surveil Trump’s life—past and present—with impunity, and it was all based on paid for opposition research from the Clinton campaign and the DNC. All of this was based on Trump’s limited contact with Carter Page,

 

Trump’s life, as well as everybody in his campaign, was subject to investigation by the FBI…"

 

webelieveamerica.wordpress.com/2018/02/06/title-1-fisa-warrant-stripped-trump-of-all-rights/

Anonymous ID: ce2175 May 4, 2018, 6:45 p.m. No.1303003   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3158

Rosenstein's comment about not being "extorted" implies that he considers the DOJ/FBI as a 4th co-equal branch of government-not subject to Presidential decisions or Congressional oversight.

 

Can't think of a single legitimate reason he still has his job if he feels he can unilaterally change the Constitution.