>>13313391
3/4
Sarah Ndiaye is one of the Greens councillors who has helped Lhamo. Ndiaye is not a 5G sceptic, or anti-vaccination, but she understands why people don’t trust government.
Tony Abbott said he wouldn’t cut funding to the ABC, and then he did. Doctors are prevented from telling the truth about how we treat refugees in detention. The government raids journalists and locks up whistleblowers, and they ignore climate change science. “Why should people like Tashi trust them? I’m not as cynical as people like her are. I have a more comprehensive understanding of the complexities of governance, but I don’t resent their distrust.”
Ndiaye has a background as a journalist. She says it is about critical thinking - going to original sources, triangulating information, being prepared to question.
But critical thinking is what QAnon people say they are doing - and the rest of us are failing to do. They call us #sheeple - people like sheep, because of our trust in authority.
I wonder why I believe differently to Lhamo. It’s not true to say it’s about scientific evidence. It’s more about authority - accepting the word of an elite. I am not a climate change scientist, nor an expert in infectious diseases, nor knowledgeable about radiation, yet I believe in COVID as a real threat, and in human-induced climate change, and am calm about 5G. I trust in certain kinds of qualifications, certain kinds of consensus, certain kinds of authority.
I have heard many stories of Australians pulled into QAnon. There is the senior accountant - once part of an Australian state anti-corruption body - who has cut off his contact with friends and now spends most of his time interpreting “Q-drops”. There are doctors and lawyers and journalists of all ages and localities.
The wellness industry - naturopathy, homeopathy - is a recognised ‘soft’ path into the QAnon world. And which of us has not taken a vitamin supplement for which there is no, or only dubious, scientific evidence?
And then there is reality. There is corruption. There are reasons to worry about big pharmaceutical and chemical companies and their power. There are abusers in Hollywood. There are paedophiles in the churches. There is Harvey Weinstein. There is Jeffrey Epstein.
In Nimbin, where the hippies settled after the 1973 Aquarius Festival, I learned that, despite popular belief, the hippies never dropped out. They were angry, some of them. Alienated. They had high hopes and many of these were dashed. And yet they stayed engaged.
Arguably, the Australia environment movement started here when some of the recently settled hippies heard the Terania Creek rainforest was to be clear-felled. They mounted the first physical blockade to protect rainforest in Australia. They won. Neville Wran’s government saved the forest, and today it is part of the Nightcap National Park.
Through protest, through petitions, through public speaking tours, for causes both local and global, powerful and hopeless, the hippies continued to engage. They are still doing it today.
When they succeeded it was not on their own, but because other institutions of liberal democracy also acted. Neville Wran’s government for the Terania forest. The High Court in the Tasmanian Dams case. Bob Hawke and the Daintree Forest.
Compare the hippies to the mob that raided the Capitol in Washington. The latter had no list of demands, no proposed program for bringing about change. Some of the militia organisations apparently had plans - to capture and maybe even kill lawmakers - but when Trump failed to lead them, most of the QAnon mob had no idea what to do.
Will this movement now fade away? Or will its followers remain - disconnected, angry, beyond the reach of the rest of the world - waiting for a more effective leader?
Ndiaye represents the challenges faced by politicians in a representative democracy when some of their electors are “finding their own truth”. It is the trajectory of people like Lhamo that will determine the future of this political problem. Engaged, changing and changed, like the hippies - or isolated, distrusting, perhaps dangerous?
(continued)