Anonymous ID: f35f45 March 13, 2021, 9:35 p.m. No.13201695   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13201552 PB

>https://thedcpatriot.com/bidens-signature-wont-appear-on-stimulus-checks-but-donald-j-trumps-will-the-white-house-says/

 

It didn't say that DJT's signature will be present.

Anonymous ID: f35f45 March 13, 2021, 9:39 p.m. No.13201713   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13201659

It didn't say Trump's signature will be on the stimulus check.

>>13201552

from PB

>https://thedcpatriot.com/bidens-signature-wont-appear-on-stimulus-checks-but-donald-j-trumps-will-the-white-house-says/

Anonymous ID: f35f45 March 13, 2021, 9:45 p.m. No.13201740   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1768 >>1776 >>1793 >>2090 >>2189 >>2249 >>2289 >>2302 >>2309 >>2314

Reporters Banned from Using The Term ‘Illegal Immigrant’

 

The Wall Street Journal is banning its reporters from using the terms “illegal immigrant” and “illegal” when referring to illegal aliens living in the US.

 

In an update in ts style guide, the WSJ, which owned by billionaire Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp., stated that while it will allow reporters to continue using the term “illegal immigration” to describe the process of illegal aliens arriving and staying in the US, it will no longer allow reporters to describe individuals as “illegal” or “illegal immigrant”.

 

https://newspunch.com/reporters-banned-from-using-the-term-illegal-immigrant/

Anonymous ID: f35f45 March 13, 2021, 10:33 p.m. No.13201980   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2067 >>2189 >>2249 >>2289 >>2302 >>2309 >>2314

Twitter Using Section 230 To Avoid Child Sex Trafficking Lawsuit.

 

Twitter is seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by a child sex trafficking victim and relying on Section 230 to do so.

 

The controversial section of the Communications Decency Act, which has recently come under fire from conservatives, is a critical part of Twitter’s argument for the dismissal of the case.

 

“Given that Twitter’s alleged liability here rests on its failure to remove content from its platform, dismissal of the Complaint with prejudice is warranted on this ground alone,” the social media platform argued.

 

“The lawsuit, filed in January, is accusing the Silicon Valley company of knowingly benefiting financially from the dissemination of sexual abuse material when it failed to immediately act on multiple complaints and correspondences asking it to remove the illegal and hurtful content,” the Epoch Times summarizes.

 

“Twitter is not a passive, inactive, intermediary in the distribution of this harmful material; rather, Twitter has adopted an active role in the dissemination and knowing promotion and distribution of this harmful material,” the lawsuit notes before blaming “Twitter’s own policies, practices, business model, and technology architecture.”

 

The lawsuit also outlines how Twitter failed to report child sexual abuse content in a timely fashion, allowing the content to be viewed over 167,000 times and re-tweeted 2,200 times before it was removed.

 

Twitter defended the delay by emphasizing how the “sheer volume” of Tweets posted to the platform render it “simply not possible for Twitter … to remove all offending content immediately or accurately in all cases.”

 

https://thenationalpulse.com/breaking/twitter-230-lawsuit-child-sex-trafficking/