This video of about child pedophillia byMark Atwood reciting a poem, “We see You” was posted many times last night, I’m surprised it never made notable. For the Anon who posted this last night deserve the credit
"We See You" by Mark Attwood #SaveOurChildren
>>13235258 This looks like a unifying effort RE: Confirmation Votes in The Senate
Samantha Power in charge of USAID would be saying, Deep State it’s time to steal all the free money that citizens expect to help others. Much more than the wolf guarding the henhouse. I can’t imagine a more unqualified deviant thief to run this department, if she’s confirmed than it’s just further confirmation Republicans only oppose for political gain and money. Put them in the position than the RNC fund raises. Sundance is right Republicans get more power and money when they lose.
>>13235291 The Washington Post's Fake Trump Quote Scandal Is a Lot Worse Than You Think
very good article
The media conspiracy against Trump became a lot more serious on Monday when the Washington Post retracted its January story claiming that President Donald Trump had pressured Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to “find the fraud” in the 2020 election and said that he’d be a “national hero” if he did.
A recording of the call definitively proved that the quotes cited by the Washington Post, and then parroted by other outlets, were never actually said by the president at all.
But, as Becket Adams explains at the Washington Examiner, “the Washington Post’s dud of a ‘bombshell’ isn’t even the most scandalous thing about this episode in media malfeasance.”
The most scandalous thing, Adams, argues, is that several different newsrooms “claimed they independently ‘confirmed’ the original ‘scoop’ with anonymous sources of their own.”
NBC News reported it “confirmed The Post’s characterization of the Dec. 23 call through a source familiar with the conversation.”
USA Today claimed a “Georgia official speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters confirmed the details of the call.”
ABC News reported: “President Donald Trump phoned a chief investigator in Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office asking the official to ‘find the fraud’ and telling this person they would be a ‘national hero’ for it, an individual familiar with the matter confirmed to ABC News.”
PBS NewsHour and CNN likewise appeared to claim they independently “confirmed” the story through their own anonymous sources.
The Washington Post claimed its quotes were confirmed by an anonymous source, and at least five major news outlets claimed to independently confirm that Trump said things he never said. “The most likely scenario is ABC, the Washington Post, and others talked to the same person or group,” theorizes Adams. “It’s either that or a bunch of people managed somehow to be wrong about a very specific claim, which is highly unlikely.”
Unless, of course, none of these five outlets actually confirmed anything, but merely claimed so. This is possible, but considering the fact that the recording of the call was found in the trash folder of a Georgia state official’s computer seems to suggest that one or more Georgia state officials conspired to come up with a damaging version of the phone call, leak the phony details to the media, and then cover up evidence of the actual call.
Regardless which scenario took place, the implications are bad.
“The uncomfortable questions we are left with now are: Whom were they all speaking to? How did this person or these persons get the details of Trump’s private phone call wrong? Are there additional examples of the media reporting bad information provided by anonymous sources we don’t know about, merely because there’s no contradictory audio or video?” writes Adams. “Just how many anonymously sourced stories are fraudulent? If it can happen this easily, who is to say it doesn’t happen often? Further, how many of these bogus stories have enjoyed the backing of supposed independent corroboration when, in fact, newsrooms most likely talked to the same person or people?”
President Trump got a lot of flak for calling the media the “enemy of the people.” But it seems like they’ve been doing a good job at proving Trump was right about them.
So true my journalist friend has been saying this for many many years. The ethics of journalism says that anonymous sources should only be used if the source can be harmed or killed, if you go back many years major outlets used to have ethics, now that the CIA is fully in control if the media and propaganda is allowed by law, there’s no punishment for lying
Yes I saw, this was amazing though. Thanks to the anon that found and posted it
Tomorrow is Saint Patrick’s day, the symbolical reason of driving the snakes out of Ireland
The Day of St Patrick and the myth of snakes being cast out of Ireland
aprilholloway
Today marks Saint Patrick’s Day, or the Feast of Saint Patrick, a cultural and religious holiday celebrated every year on 17 th March in Ireland and by Irish communities around the world. The celebration marks the anniversary of Saint Patrick’s death in the fifth century and represents the arrival of Christianity in the country. The Irish have observed this day as a holiday for over 1,000 years, and while the festival began as a religious feast day for the patron saint of Ireland, today it has become an international celebration of Irish culture.
Over the centuries, the mythology surround the life of Saint Patrick has become ever more ingrained in the Irish culture. Patrick, the patron saint of Ireland, is credited with expelling all the snakes from Ireland, and today, not a single snake can be found there. But the true meaning of the casting away of all snakes runs much deeper.
Saint Patrick was born in Roman Britain in the 4 th century AD, into a wealthy family. According to the Declaration, he was kidnapped by Irish raiders at the age of sixteen and taken as a slave to Gaelic Ireland. There he spent six years working as a shepherd and during this time he “found God”. The Declaration says that God told Patrick to flee to the coast, where a ship would be waiting to take him home. After making his way home, Patrick went on to become a priest.
According to tradition, Patrick returned to Ireland to convert the pagan Irish to Christianity. The Declaration, a Latin letter which is generally accepted to have been written by St Patrick, says that he spent many years preaching in the northern half of Ireland and converted "thousands". Tradition holds that he died on 17 March and was buried at Downpatrick. Over the following centuries, many legends grew up around Patrick and he became Ireland's foremost saint. While his true name was Maewyn Succat, he later became known as St Patrick, named after his place of burial.
The symbol of the shamrock
On St Patrick's Day it is customary to wear shamrocks and green clothing. St Patrick is said to have used the shamrock, a three-leaf clover, to explain the Holy Trinity to the pagan Irish. This story first appears in writing in 1726, though it may be older. In pagan Ireland, three was a significant number and the Irish had many triple deities. The triple spiral symbol, or Triskelion, appears at many ancient megalithic and Neolithic sites in Ireland. It is carved into the rock of a stone lozenge near the main entrance of the prehistoric Newgrange monument in County Meath, Ireland. Newgrange, which was built around 3200 BC, predated the Celtic arrival in Ireland but has long since been incorporated into Celtic culture.
St Patrick banishes the snakes from Ireland
The absence of snakes in Ireland gave rise to the legend that they had all been banished by St. Patrick chasing them into the sea after they attacked him during a 40-day fast he was undertaking on top of a hill. However, all evidence suggests that post-glacial Ireland never had snakes. Water has surrounded Ireland since the end of the last glacial period, preventing snakes from slithering over; before that, it was blanketed in ice and too chilly for the cold-blooded creatures. Scholars believe the snake story is an allegory for St Patrick’s eradication of pagan ideology.
The snake was the symbol of the Celts and their spiritual elite, the Druids - who inhabited the island of Ireland long before the arrival of Christianity in the 5th century AD. When Patrick arrived, the only “pesky and dangerous creatures” that St Patrick wished to cast away were the native Celts.
Since snakes often represent evil in literature, "when Patrick drives the snakes out of Ireland, it is symbolically saying he drove the old, evil, pagan ways out of Ireland [and] brought in a new age," said classics professor Philip Freeman of Luther College in Iowa.
https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-general/day-st-patrick-and-myth-snakes-being-cast-out-ireland-001455
I had an appt with a FL doctor last week and it was wild and great, some things we talked about
He said hospitals were paid $14,000 by HHS for every Covid diagnosis it gave, another $25,000 for use of ventilators
He used to be a full time OBgyN delivering babies and he would see a truck drive up to the hospital weekly to collect the placenta from the births. His opinion were they were putting it into cosmetics, I asked maybe it was Pharma collecting it. He told a patient you’d be surprised to know the cosmetics you put on your face has some else’s placenta in it
He stopped eating chicken fingers because of the unknown meat in them. He even raised his own chickens but couldn’t kill them! Kek
The Pharma companies came calling to ask him to be a center for vaccine injections and offered him a bunch of money, he refused to meet with them
He says what we know, vaccine is changing the DNA of people snd cutting them off from God
We talked about a lot of things, child trafficking, pedophillia, the fraudulent election etc.
And we also talked about my health and gave me a prescription
It’s great to know there are truthful and honorable doctors still around
I received notices from CMS yesterday touting under the Biden Admin they are paying higher amounts to doctors to give the vaccine and more to facilities:
UPDATED: Coding: Once the Emergency Use Authorization or approval of each COVID- 19 vaccine product is received from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), states should alert Medicaid providers to the new American Medical Association (AMA) published codes for reporting of COVID-19 immunizations. The AMA published3 codes for two potential vaccines on November 10, 2020. States should continue to monitor the AMA CPT code publications to stay current on the COVID-19 vaccine product codes as they are published.
UPDATED: Medicare Payment: On March 15, 2021, CMS is updating the Medicare payment rates for COVID-19 vaccine administration. Effective for services furnished on or after March 15, 2021, the new Medicare payment rate for administering a COVID-19 vaccine will be approximately $40 to administer each dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. This means that starting on March 15, 2021, for single dose COVID-19 vaccines, Medicare will pay approximately $40 for its administration. Starting on March 15, 2021, for COVID-19 vaccines requiring multiple doses, Medicare will pay approximately $40 for each dose in the series. This rate reflects updated information about the costs involved in administering the COVID-19 vaccine for different types of providers and suppliers, and the additional resources necessary to ensure the vaccine is administered safely and appropriately. The rate will be geographically adjusted based on where the service is furnished.
CMS recognizes that Medicare’s announcement of changes in the payment for COVID-19 vaccine administration, combined with authorization of a temporary 100 percent FMAP effective April 1, 2021 in the American Rescue Plan Act for state expenditures for medical assistance for a COVID-19 vaccine and its administration, might have implications for states
with approved SPAs or pending SPAs, and for states considering payment changes for vaccine administration. States with questions on the impact of these changes on their program should contact CMS for technical assistance. CMS intends to provide additional guidance to states on implementation of the 100 percent FMAP available for payments to providers for administering the COVID-19 vaccine
https://www.medicaid.gov/state-resource-center/downloads/covid-19-vaccine-toolkit.pdf#page8
We are in a sick world Anons, I wish I could have convinced my siblings not to take the shots but they did it anyway, almost all with seriously underlying conditions
Alexander Vindman Proposes Suing Conservative Media to ‘Deradicalize’ It
Joel B. Pollak16 Mar 2021
They should court martial this asshole
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman (Ret.), a key figure in the first impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, published an op-ed Monday at the Lawfare blog in which he proposed suing conservative media outlets to make them less “radicalized.”
Vindman had worked at the National Security Council, and appeared in dress uniform before the House Intelligence Committee to testify against Trump in support of the theory that Trump had withheld aid from Ukraine in exchange for investigating his 2020 rival, Democrat Joe Biden. (Evidence provided by other witnesses contradicted that claim.)
Vindman would not reveal who the anonymous “whistleblower” was who reported the president’s phone call with the Ukrainian president, and recent analysis by Byron York of the Washington Examiner has suggested that Vindman himself was the main instigator of the investigation that led to the impeachment, which ultimately led to Trump’s acquittal.
During the impeachment inquiry, Vindman made much of the fact that he and his family had fled the Soviet Union, and that he had “a deep appreciation for American values and ideals and the power of freedom.”
Now, lamenting that he had not responded by suing President Trump over tweets about him, and noting that the First Amendment “gravely” limits what government can do to stop “lies” by the media, Vindman argues that “right-wing media” (alone) should be held accountable through a lawsuit strategy:
Recent events have made the need for accountability more pressing than ever. Should anyone be surprised that viewers of right-wing media are radicalized when media personalities themselves promote radical ideas based on lies?
But while the rioters are being held accountable through the criminal justice system—and Congress at least had a chance to hold the former president accountable through the impeachment process—how can Americans hold the right-wing media responsible for its role in the attack? The mob that attacked the Capitol was born of hatred fomented by the right-wing media. These insurrectionists were raised for years on a steady diet of disinformation and half-truths, which produced the fertile fields for radicalization.
The First Amendment gravely limits the available tools to seek accountability for the right-wing media. Policymakers cannot, after all, tell media organizations what to say. Except in the most extreme situations, which are unlikely ever to arise, prosecutors also cannot accuse them of incitement.
Civil consequences, rather than governmental restrictions on First Amendment rights, could be a meaningful way to take what are fundamentally money-making ventures and demand truth from them, instill rigor in their reporting, and uphold accountability. Like a tabloid being sued and paying severe penalties, media companies and right-wing media personalities will claim that what’s at stake is freedom of speech. But defamation is not covered by the First Amendment, so this is, by definition, not true. And the generous standards in defamation law for purposes of protecting the press offer a true safe haven for good-faith actors even when they err. Putting companies in fear of the real costs in civil damages for slander, libel, and false claims that can cumulatively incite violence and that can individually harm actual human beings should have a restraining effect on their behavior.
Read Vindman’s full op-ed at Lawfare.
Vindman’s strategy replicates that used by left-wing pressure group Media Matters, whose “Project 2012” strategy document called for lawsuits to be brought against “Fox News and its feeders,” providing “counsel or litigation costs” to potential plaintiffs.
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2021/03/16/alexander-vindman-proposes-suing-conservative-media-to-deradicalize-it/
Gavin Newsom Blames QAnon, ‘Anti-vaxxers,’ ‘Anti-Immigrant Trump Supporters’ for Recall
Joel B. Pollak16 Mar 2021
Dog whistle excuse, it couldn’t be that he’s corrupt as hell
California Governor Gavin Newsom attempted to deflect efforts to recall him by linking Monday to a website that blames “national Republicans, anti-vaxxers, Q-Anon conspiracy theorists and anti-immigrant Trump supporters” for the campaign.
Newsom linked Monday to the “Stop the Republican Recall” website, which declares on its opening page:
A partisan, Republican coalition of national Republicans, anti-vaxxers, Q-Anon conspiracy theorists and anti-immigrant Trump supporters.
According to the Los Angeles Times, they include “peddlers of Q-Anon doomsday conspiracies; ‘patriots’ readying for battle and one organization allied with the far-right extremist group, the Proud Boys.”
Instead of helping fight the pandemic, these partisan forces are pulling a page from the Trump playbook and attacking Californians.
Newsom’s opponents, however, include Democrats as well, such as left-wing billionaire mega-donor Chamath Palihapitiya, who appeared to launch his own campaign for governor earlier this year.
Newsom’s rivals have collected roughly 2 million signatures ahead of the March 17 deadline — some 500,000 more than needed, enough to defeat an attempt to have signatures disqualified.
The San Francisco Chronicle noted Monday that Newsom could adopt a “long-shot” strategy of convincing enough signatories to change their minds:
Once the recall campaign turns in its petitions, county election officials have until April 29 to count how many registered voters signed and report their numbers to the secretary of state’s office.
The state then has 10 days to tally the counties’ results. If the recall campaign has qualified, it starts the signature-withdrawal period, in which voters get 30 business days to let their local election officials know they’d like to remove their names from the petition. Voters are offered the chance regardless of whether the Newsom campaign tries to persuade them to do so.
Then counties have 10 more business days to report the number of rescinded signatures back to the secretary of state. Assuming the recall is still eligible, the state Department of Finance gets 30 business days to estimate how much the election will cost, and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee has another 30 days to review the estimate.
Only then is the recall certified, at which point Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis must call an election within 60 to 80 days. That timeline could push a vote all the way to November or December.
The extended schedule for a recall effort was adopted by the Democrat-dominated California legislature to protect State Sen. Josh Newman from a recall. He was ultimately recalled, but won election back to his old seat last year.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/03/16/gavin-newsom-blames-qanon-anti-vaxxers-anti-immigrant-trump-supporters-for-recall/
Trump didnt allow it, he didn’t make policy, his heads at CMs and HHS made those decisions, they intentionally sabotaged him, they were on on it. Alex Azaar, HHS worked for Pharma companies all his life and the Indian lady at CMS
Every single leader in every department except a few sabotaged Trump and made covid 19 a plandemic. That’s why they did it, they knew he wouldn’t win the election with the baggage they created, they had no idea of the support so they had to steal it by other means
Absolutely giving money to doctors and hospitals to kill them, very few independent doctors now. The doctor I met with said every doctor that sold their practices under hospitals have to tow the party line.
He knew they were intentionally killing people by preventing ivermectin and hydroxy chloroquinn
This world is upside down the criminals run the country anc the criminals have a voice, why let criminals out of jail? Intimidation and penalize toon of right thought
So there’s still some good military?
I had a military helicopter over my house in north Georgia near Cumming yesterday, I’ve never seen one before during the during, months ago they were flying over at night
I forgot to mention the Fl doctor said they are definitely using crispr technology in the vaccines