Anonymous ID: c2ddde April 7, 2021, 3:23 a.m. No.13376827   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6831 >>6837 >>6849

>>13376796

>muh baker bad, kitchen comped

>muh intentionally hide information, by not collection notables from previous threads, although anyone could do that, anyone can be a baker as well

>>13376817

>muh I'm not doing shit

Choose one.

 

At least bakers bake. You are doing jack shit.

Anonymous ID: c2ddde April 7, 2021, 3:26 a.m. No.13376840   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6844 >>6861 >>6866

>>13376831

I'm actually a somewhat global baker, scraping ALL threads, not deleting (censoring) anything, and putting it all in the notables thread(s).

 

No one stopped me. No one did that before I did as consequently as I do it now for months.

Anonymous ID: c2ddde April 7, 2021, 3:39 a.m. No.13376865   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6870 >>6874

>>13376856

>This is why I love you clowns

Wtf is wrong with you schizo?

I'm actually collecting notables for months now, automatically, and posting them in the notables thread. Every single day.

 

Prove that I censor anything, you can't because I don't censor anything.

Calling me a clown is ridiculous.

 

>Why are notables constantly "tbc"

Because you are doing JACK SHIT, and instead you complain that the bakers should do it, although you are doing JACK SHIT and have tons of spare time and even make a big deal out of it without doing ANYTHING yourself.

 

No one is stopping you from doing it.

It's even a miracle that there are still bakers around that bake when there are bread shitters like you non stop complaining and throwing around insults and calling everyone who actually does something a clown.

Anonymous ID: c2ddde April 7, 2021, 3:49 a.m. No.13376887   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6895 >>6906 >>6969

>>13376866

>What did no one do before you did?

Filling the notables thread.

It was done, sometimes, maybe 5% of all threads were posted in there.

And I'm doing way more than that anyway, which was also done manually - sometimes.

 

I did implement that because a few bakers complained about that March last year and they were right.

 

>Censoring is not the same thing as leaving out material that is not on point.

When there is no baker, no notables can be collected.

When there is a baker, you want that person to go back to ebakes and collect notables? How about you do that?

 

As far as I have seen, it's always done at some point. Sometimes it takes even 1 or 2 days. If you want it to happen faster, simply do it yourself, post a bun for the baker and done. I have seen that happen various times.

 

>>13376874

>No where did I even mention the deletion of notables, clown

You called me a clown, which implies that I'm not actually doing proper work, you fucking schizo, but I do.

>for your clown group.

I'm not part of any group.

I have been in contact with the qresear.ch anon a few times on a private channel, but that's it.

>Bakers have never had this much trouble keeping notables up to date until you faggots came along.

You do not even make logical sense.

TBC threads are threads without baker.

This means that there are not enough bakers.

Anonymous ID: c2ddde April 7, 2021, 3:53 a.m. No.13376895   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13376887

>but that's it.

Have to adjust that, I was also in contact a few times with the wearethene.ws anon(s), but that was on the /comms/ board, all of that was public, not private.

Anonymous ID: c2ddde April 7, 2021, 4:04 a.m. No.13376925   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6954

>>13376906

>Listen faggot, you joined into the conversation with an attack on me without considering anything I've pointed out.

Listen schizo, you are screaming at the baker, here in the current bread, but not about this bread, but about the baker not going through ebakes immediately himself.

 

How about YOU DO IT, or shut the fuck up?

When you post a proper bun for the baker and the baker rejects it, then you can complain. Before that simply stfu.

 

>Like I expected. Other bakers have attempted to bake

Not yesterday. And I haven't seen that happen at least in the last few months.

>all bakers are clowns

>BV are also all clowns

>in fact BO is a clown too

Ok, schizo. Why are you here then when everyone is a clown except you?

Anonymous ID: c2ddde April 7, 2021, 4:20 a.m. No.13376965   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6976

>>13376954

>You're so angry

I'm not. I'm calm as the calm before the storm.

Stop projecting, schizo.

>You also declined to collect notables

I'm not the one complaining about previous ebakes. Stop projecting.

Your problems are not mine.

>You come out of no where attacking me

Because I see an asshole attacking a baker with retarded bullshit that makes no sense, and I'm sick of assholes.

>Only retards or clowns would deny the possibility of the kitchen as being an attack vector

You are the one claiming that every baker is a clown, BO+BVs are clowns and I would also be a clown.

Me calling you a schizo is just me stating a fact. And in turn maybe you are actually the clown intentionally attacking bakers to make them not want to do that job anymore.

Anonymous ID: c2ddde April 7, 2021, 4:26 a.m. No.13376983   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7005

>>13376976

>Find the post where I claimed bo/bvs are clowns

Why is your UID different now?

You claimed that "real anons" trying to bake will make these threads get locked and only the "clown baker crew" would be able to bake.

 

Bakers CAN NOT lock threads, which means BV would have to be involved, which in turn even means BO would have to be comp'd to allow that, especially over a long time.

 

See, you claim something and do not even think about it.

Anonymous ID: c2ddde April 7, 2021, 4:41 a.m. No.13377021   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13377005

>All my claims can be verified

You claimed I was a clown, and that can not be verified, because I'm not a clown, I'm doing proper job which in turn can be verified by anyone.

So I will call you a liar from now on.

 

>but comped bakers would mean comped BO/BVs. I'll give you that.

No, comped bakers would not mean that.

Comped bakers obviously happens, just take a look at some bakers where it's constantly "muh jews this", "muh jews that". That's obviously comped bakers who want to paint this here as a neo-nazi board, while the opposite of that is actually the truth.

And I will even post these notables, although I strongly disagree with that shit, because I'm not censoring anything.

 

Locking threads to lock out every single actual anon would mean comped BO/BVs, which you actually claimed. I have personally never tried to bake, maybe I should try it at some point.

 

>What is your aversion to the idea of the most attacked board on the internet of being completely comped?

Because you are here of all places, attacking bakers, also effectively attacking BV+BOs and calling other anons clowns without any proofs whatsoever.

 

>Q even asked us to 'Tidy up the ship' due to all the fuckery in the kitchen

Now that's funny.

If this place was fully comped as you claim, then Q would be comped too. But you don't claim that. Why?

 

>your clown nature

Ok, bye schizo.