>>13377582 (lb)

Going to add some pictures to this

1. Cullen knew about Fred's post here, and let him tell his story about how he lied about it (exposes Fred).

2. Cullen needlessly flies out to Philippines just to turn right around and fly back with Fred (who mysteriously gets his ID card as they are leaving?)

3. Oh! Look who Fred's friends with (Cernovich). Isn't Vox an HBO deal? Sort of makes you wonder just how long this really has been in the works. Also, why does Freddy seem to have a mentor just like LeBron James?

4. If you haven't read this neon revolt article, then you need to:

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2019/11/02/replatforming-8kun-and-the-tragedy-of-judasasschariots-hw_beat_that-bad-choices-qanon-greatawakening-neonrevolt/

1. No, I'm serious. Read that article in #4, then think about who treated Fred to his "homecoming" in Philippines and why it was done in such a way.

2. What does the documentary tell us about Jim and Fred's real circumstances about each of their departures from Philippines?

3. Ron still insists he's not Q, and again, Cullen knows this, and is perfectly neutral in his coverage while seeming to "get along" really well with the Fred side of things for optics.

If you still think Cullen is biased, take a look at this. Cullen even uses "psyop" to appear jokingly against Vallely (this also calls his claims out for the bullshit they are):

https://twitter.com/CullenHoback/status/1379647715777282049

@CullenHoback

Try saying Vallely 3 times fast. If your tongue gets twisted, it might be a psyop ;) #QIntotheStorm

https://twitter.com/4_04_Not_Found/status/1379772231983759361

@4_04_Not_Found

General Flynn gave an awesome shout out to anons last night!

Frog face

“You have some really, really high quality analysts who are thoughtful and do superb research…I probably had the largest law firm in the world, ever… fighting the Deep State and fighting our own government…”

>>13377731

Haven't seen that one in a while.

>>13377818

I think we'll get there when we finally figure out how to temper the zealous affirmations of the blindly adherent with the insistent demands of secular free speech proponents. There's a scripture PDJT liked to quote in 2 Cor 3:17 that sums it up for him. Even so, he appears to really be more in the middle between the 2 crowds that want the same goal; restoration of the Republic.

Even Q would seem to zig zag between a secular moral humanism (enlightenment!) and God-fearing Christianity (tradition!), and this was on purpose. When you see the link between the Republic itself, and the role of a unifying ideology such as Christianity, it makes sense. When you realize most of the founders did not have an absolutist approach to God inasmuch as endorsing a specific religion, it becomes a little more clear in the how/why we're in this mess we are in now.

No one should ever accept anything on blind faith, and seeing past the iconography to the real truth is something most aren't quite ready for, yet. For the moral humanist, it takes a bit of time to wait for the faithful believers to open up to the idea that God might just be a little bit bigger than the box they've painted him in, and that's OK, too. One thing's for certain, we won't get there without each other.

>>13377910

When you are a child, someone exposes you to a belief system, and you blindly accept it as truth. Later on, you might grow to question some details, and if you dig deep enough, you realize that the answers become fewer and fewer between. In your journey, you might "find God", or you might find another way. As long as truth/light is the focus, I'm not sure what the real problem is, here.

If everyone in this world is pigeon-holed into believing a very specific set of circumstances for a very specific brand of salvation, then the entire world's population, God's creation, is a stake of being eternally lost. If knowledge of God and truth is to be unifying, then creating a belief system that gets you there is one thing. Insisting that everyone that doesn't adhere to your prescribed system will perish at the hands of a most graceful God is invoking fear for control. Accepting that we all seek the same thing in one say or another in the common goal to preserve the Republic?

That's unity.

>>13377983

Blind faith isn't redundant. It's an expression meant to put emphasis on zealous belief. And faith? "Faith is the substance of things hoped for, evidence of things not seen."

This is exemplified in the plan. If you don't see it, and do not understand the reason the plan has incorporated this "belief" into the plan for a reason, then you might be missing one of the major points of the plan.

My use isn't contemptuous at all, and if that's what you read into it, that's on you. The focus on my posts re: religion and moral humanism is on the unifying aspect of finding truth. Not all people take the same path of discovery, but in accordance with your belief, each path that leads to the truth is led by God (seeking truth/light). This isn't about elevating ourselves, it's about learning. The more we learn, the less we realize we know.

Insisting on the scientific approach to proof and fact isn't a step away from truth or God. It's the human method in which we attempt to prove that which God left for us to discover in our journey for understanding. To insist there is only one way to find God is to do a complete and utter disservice to the discoveries that wait for us behind every study of all things in life. If the goal of a religion is to rebuke all forms of discovery of God, then its purpose is to imprison, not free.

This should be a lot simpler for you to understand.

>>13378090

Aw, c'mon. It's fun to do sometimes.

>>13378092

Gotcha.

>>13378107

I merely quoted scripture to help you understand the message you were trying to convey, and how the people that put this plan together even thought of that, and the reason for it is simple:

Christianity can be used as a unifying ideology. In this instance, it is.

Review 2 Cor 3:17

I'll attempt to phrase it differently. Anything that gets in the way of freedom and the preservation of the republic is the enemy. Running psyop games with religion to get people to understand how to dig for facts/truth is this is the same as convincing people to discover the truth for themselves through their own verifiable system of fact-checking. Same mission, same goal. Your issue seems to be that some might not fall into a very specific belief system you propose. While I insist secular proponents of the republic and religious adherents have the same mission, you've spent several posts indicating these groups of people are enemies.

The only way forward is together. Division does us no good.

https://twitter.com/ilDonaldoTrumpo/status/1379825989241479169

@ilDonaldoTrumpo

Matt Gaetz attacks intensifying and situation looks more difficulto? GOOD!!! I STAND WITH MATTY GAETZ!!! WE NO STANDO WITH OURFAMILIA WHEN IT´S CONVENIENT. WE RIDE AND FRIGGIN DIE WITH OUR FAMILIA!!!

https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1379820005932556295

@DonaldJTrumpJr

This story got barely any traction given the severity, so I have no choice but to assume the shooter was not a white male conservative.

>>13378188

>>13378262

>>13378296

>i think i'm smellin' what yur steppin' in

Just asking questions, anon. I'm OK with Christianity being a vehicle to the truth, but we need to stop treating it like a religion, and prescribe a healthy dose of Republicanism into the belief system before it's lost to the squelching effects of communism which has infiltrated our entire society. Without the Republic, there is no Christianity. Without Christianity, there is no Republic. Both need to be tempered to respect each other as pillars for the same foundation; a free society. President Trump seems to understand this better than most.

>>13378312

And yet we still don't have a valid reason why God would've ever required a blood sacrifice. Gosh darn it. If someone knew the answer to that, we'd have the answer to a lot of the questions in the religion, now wouldn't we?

>>13378343

>You actually hate that Christianity claims that Jesus is the ONLY way to be saved.

I never said that, you did. What I hate is a misrepresentation of the Gospels being used to induce fear and control. There's more important fish to fry than arguing over doctrinal nonsense that isn't going to preserve the republic from subversion by the CCP.

I'm looking for the scripture where that's talked about, but I'm coming up a bit short. Perhaps you can contribute?

>>13378375

Ah, so it finally comes to this; defending murder. God created us, and we're born "into a world of sin". So we have to kill things to get close to God because he didn't get it right out of the gate? Pretty stupid idea, really. And, after a few thousand years of getting it wrong, God decides to step in, himself, and get it right on our behalf by killing himself unto himself.

Why is God so bloodthirsty?

>>13378401

One of two things happened:

1. Accelerator stuck.

2. Tiger likes to drive fast on roads he's not as familiar with.

>>13378415

>you refute Jesus' assertion that He is the Truth,

I never once refuted him. I merely implied you mistranslated what he meant by it. That's a much deeper conversation than saying I denied him (which I never have).

>>13378443

It is open to interpretation. Did he mean believing in him personally, or his way of belief and living? Jesus was the representation of the way, truth, and life, and you insist I believe in a specific way what that means? Your understanding of how it works isn't any more authoritative than the Pope, or your favorite mega church pastors, or Joe Preacherman down the street.

You're having an Homoousianist conversation in a world that proves they were distinct people. In the end, the decision to crucify him lead to the destruction of the temple and subsequent seizure and rebranding of the system of belief into the Roman gov't. Or was all that planned somehow? I suppose we'll never truly know.

At least we don't have to kill rabbits and cows at the alter anymore. That just seems retarded, doesn't it?