Anonymous ID: f6a6c3 April 26, 2021, 10:11 a.m. No.13517489   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7510

>>13517424

Thanks.

 

Sad.

Too bad none of those people seem to have a clue (or are willful) about using something as simple as a single long run of tables, passing each ballot single file down the unbroken line of tables with every person there standing along either side and making tally.

 

This looks DESIGNED to be convoluted, difficult to follow, tedious, and filled with opportunities to literally trip and spill boxes across the floor and mix it all up. “Oops, sorry”

 

Not impressed, at all.

Anonymous ID: f6a6c3 April 26, 2021, 10:43 a.m. No.13517692   🗄️.is đź”—kun

What other reason can there be, except to obscure deception, to not have ballots moving down in one distinct direction, upon a long table or conveyor, with counters and observers along either side, using as much analog human eye or electronic gadgetification as wished, and end with a simple answer to the additive mathematics of votes marked on paper?

 

At this point, deception is the only reason for such absurd convolutions.

 

Camera 6 is interesting. Can’t see which of the different piles the examiner is placing which determinations of which ballots that get scanned or not scanned. Just out of view.

Anonymous ID: f6a6c3 April 26, 2021, 10:59 a.m. No.13517767   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7785

Of note: without a trustworthy schismatic or direct overhead shot of the “procession”, the individual ballots are being filled now with the oil and detritus of the “auditors”. Permanently spoiling the chance for the ballots to be examined for individuality.

 

Sorry to say, this is shaping up to be a literal cover-up. Would love to be wrong, but it’s not looking that way.