>>13545585 (pb)
I've got strong conjecture that they were not and were, instead, sent out to larp the ethnic victim in other nations and do long term infiltration.
why do I think this? because if not someone would have memorials for them.
>>13545585 (pb)
I've got strong conjecture that they were not and were, instead, sent out to larp the ethnic victim in other nations and do long term infiltration.
why do I think this? because if not someone would have memorials for them.
executions are not times of joy, anon
those of us who do not know really do not know, anon. and if there are those who know they know that we do not know.
we must be skeptics and say it's 'fake' until proven. You know this if you are on the inside.
and you would also accept that many would be skeptics.
so back off.
in the world view of the demons (if they are real) when you execute someone who harbors them that releases them to find new hosts. so if you buy into that . . . then execution is always a bad idea.
the law is what it is and if she did get it, I'm not going to be sad. But neither will I be gleeful
celbrations of Justice. I accept that.
If you knew here victims personally, I get that.
If the people had suffered greatly.
so it's true, often there are celebrations.
but recently I watched the raw footage of the Liberation of Paris.
Yes, they hung some people. Yes there was glee.
but there were snipers and people still being killed randomly . . .
and when they dragged the guy out the people were cheering.
but in general, you don't throw a party to celebrate.
if it just happens, then so it is.
this is a conflict shill
I describe the ways of the world and comment from time to time.
what you do is veiled threats and videos that no one watches.
you don't see me.
really
I can't get past your false statement ''you don't like nature"
you're building a castle of sand and it's tiny and there is no room in there for me to visit you so . . .
good bye.
call all your friends and tell them how joyous and gleeful you are over larp executions and see how that goes for you.
you failed at debate, I can't continue with you.
?
in 1936 in Moscow . . . supposedly . . .
all the shit your saying sounds like you're just garbleing crap to mock those who actually know some real history.
fairly clear about it.
you're not clever
and you're rather obvious
everytime you IP hop.
I'm not answering anymore of your mindgarble
I even discuss a real film about the Liberation of Paris, but that didn't phase it either.
keeps up with the inane conflict mongering
engaging me for no reason but just to perform
the twit-oliver persona of someone who never really understands, but attaches themselve to you and demands that you attend to their misunderstandings or it feelzz all over you.
I know about Trotsky and you have the story all wrong.
Brooklyn and Mexico where they sent him to breed
the story is well known