>>13573296 (pb)

>Why are you redoing the notables?

I'm not redoing notables.

That thread was TBC.

Then some anon posted notables of that thread (not the baker), baker linked to it later, but wasn't posted officially by baker, which means it isn't taken by scraper, at least my scraper needs baker to post notables before dough.

Look through the threads since #17179, you will see that I'm speaking truth.

That bun was actually posted by an anon in the notables bread, but links were broken too and it wasn't scrapped.

>>13573462

>incapable of a one-time copypasta

It's actually a security feature.

When the baker just links to a notables collection post, how shall it know why the baker did so? Maybe he linked to it and called the one posting it a shill?

Baker has to post notables him/herself, and it's also limited to the start of the bread.

>>13573481

clearly actors, and not the real people anymore.

>>13573528

It actually links back the the thread that notabled certain posts.

So I could do that, but then all that linking wouldn't be established.

You know the scraper even allows that additional notables are added at a later date to an existing bun.

And in this case the mistake was that the baker didn't post them. I could intervene manually, but I don't want to do that. And it works out in 99.9% of all cases.

>>13573581

That's the point.

This right here can be verified by other anons, and it checks out, because it's the truth.

If I manipulate and inject them manually, there won't be a way to provide proof for that, because I did it myself outside of 8kun, that's why I don't want to do it.

If this happens more often, I will simply bake myself, that way I can fix the issue, and it will all get documented.

My scraper is quite hardened. The wearethene.ws scraper bugs out very few days and it seems they don't get notables from here anymore. They have gotten them from /qrb/ for 2 weeks.

>>13573615

>strike

No, their scraper checks all sorts of things, and the wars in the bakery fucks that up.

And at some point they stopped caring.

It seems they have to fix it manually every time there are inconsistencies.

/qrb/ seems to take certain notables from here, so it's not that bad.

My scraper has no problems with some breads not getting notables at first, but getting them at a way later date. Also no problems with bread splits and so on. And I can manually fix certain things easily like when QResearch General is not detected automatically and such. This happened last time when the bot spamming happened.

>>13573666

A link to dough is not parsed.

I don't download from outside sources like that.

Only posts on here count.

For my scraper you need to post the notables at least once at the start of one fresh bread right before the dough.

It even fixes broken links when at least one valid link exists for that line.

Dough post stops notable collection of that bread..

Other scrapers may work differently.

>>13573783

o7

>>13573887

They know it's coming.

The Best is yet to come.