Anonymous ID: ecd6d4 May 10, 2021, 10:49 a.m. No.13628959   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9353

>>13628893

>Bitcoin is out of their control.

bruhahaha

 

Ok, then point me to the people behind bitcoin.

Oh, they are anonymous and no one knows, but it wasn't blocked everywhere yet despite being totally a major problem for banks?

Must be pure luck, I guess.

 

Even FIAT cash is better than that crap unironically.

 

How much is a bitcoin worth?

In USD?

Pay for every transaction?

Need a compromised digital gadget to do it?

Nah, I will go cash instead. Or gold, or silver, or whatever the fuck.

ID: ecd6d4 May 10, 2021, 11:49 a.m. No.13629400   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13629353

>I honestly dont trust crypto yet

You shouldn't trust it at all. Ever.

 

The internet is compromised.

Computers are compromised.

Anyone telling others to start paying using internet/computers is either a retard, or a shill.

 

>emissions

Not that these actually matter, but I'm against wasting electricity for nonsense, which bitcoin is. It's even hilarious. I mean the banks and the Roths have so much money, even if they weren't behind it from the start, they could simply mine coins like crazy for all of their Let there be (fiat) money, which further shows that anyone thinking the these coins are not controlled in one way or another is a retard.

 

For us electricity has a cost attached. For them there is no cost attached, because they own unlimited fiat already.

 

I mean they control gold + silver as well, but these at least these do not allow tracking as these "pay using computers, it's totally safe" coins do.

ID: ecd6d4 May 10, 2021, 12:05 p.m. No.13629532   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9538

>>13629507

Well, I don't want to hide everything, that would be silly. If only there was the possibility of a javascript filter, I would write code for that.

>>13629512

Sure?

When I change IPs, I get a few posts through, but I get a captcha very fast afterwards. When I don't change IPs, it lasts for almost a day.

ID: ecd6d4 May 10, 2021, 12:15 p.m. No.13629599   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13629587

Q never wrote that we should trust Q.

Doing so makes no sense, because of the disinformation necessary post anyway.

Why would you trust someone, that even told you that they have to lie to you?

Trust no one.