Anonymous ID: b04d89 May 14, 2021, 12:55 p.m. No.13661835   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1899

>>13661827

>Kaspersky claims CIA hackers could actually be behind US Colonial Pipeline attack

Oh, no!

Q said that most CIA people are real patriots.

Do you remember, when Q said that?

Anonymous ID: b04d89 May 14, 2021, 1:04 p.m. No.13661893   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13661883

>Walmart and Target among major retailers keeping mask mandate in place

The big chains, the big trusts are driving the CV frenzy.

They are the ones who want to bring in the NWO.

Anonymous ID: b04d89 May 14, 2021, 1:13 p.m. No.13661942   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1969 >>2005 >>2014 >>2056 >>2153 >>2251 >>2272

I think you got me wrong.

It was sarcasm.

Q posted that the CIA can't be saved.

He once posted Kennedy and what he said about the CIA.

And then he posted that most people inthe CIA are real patriots.

I remember this well

bc when Q posted that many Anons (including me) were outraged.

Q contradicted himself in a big way.

Nothing to excuse with "disinfo necessary".

It was outright outrageous when he posted that.

Anonymous ID: b04d89 May 14, 2021, 1:21 p.m. No.13661984   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1989

>>13661969

>Q drops are for "them"

>Don't you understand that?

Why do you assume that you understand, but other people don't?

Because you are special, gifted and other people must be dumber than you?

You don't even have the guts to admit that Q made a 180 here.

Try to grow up.

Anonymous ID: b04d89 May 14, 2021, 1:34 p.m. No.13662065   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2109 >>2132

>>13662041

>Impossible to clean is what I remember.

Yes, that's the exact wording.

Ty.

But why would it be "impossible to clean", if on the other hand "most people" there were "real patriots"?

We have to discuss what Q is saying, when this here is still qresearch and we cannot shy away from discussing where Q is contradicting himself.

Anonymous ID: b04d89 May 14, 2021, 1:40 p.m. No.13662099   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2153

>>13662081

> If you can't prove your argument by showing me

I didn't talk to you.

You breached a discussion of which you were no part.

And quit asking others for proof.

Do your own research, quit being a lazy dumb fuck and shut up.

Anonymous ID: b04d89 May 14, 2021, 1:49 p.m. No.13662143   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13662109

Ty, for your reply.

I agree with you.

The CIA seems to be the kind of organisation where the whole world would benefit, if it were dismantled.

Hopefully we'll see this happen at some point in time.

Anonymous ID: b04d89 May 14, 2021, 2 p.m. No.13662194   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13662161

And he spoke about the building:

too many columns…

"The fifth column" means communist infiltration.

Trump said that this building will get build better with less columns.

Anonymous ID: b04d89 May 14, 2021, 2:07 p.m. No.13662243   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2282 >>2355

>>13662209

> A system can be flawed without the end user being flawed.

True.

> Government requires oversight.

True.

>You keep asserting a contradiction where there isn't one.

The contradiction is here:

Q said that the CIA cannot be saved.

And later he said that most people there are real patriots.

This would mean that you would only need to fire the few bad people and then could go on with the institution because most of them are real patriots.

Q did contradict himself here.

"Cannot be saved" and most of them are real patriots/ meaning only a few are bad.