Curing cancer doesn't do much if we don't better combat aging.
The consequences for doing so would mean too many geriatrics that can't contribute and strain too many resources.
I understand how insensitive this sounds, but unfortunately continuity demands pragmatism in many regards.
Agreed. I don't believe I've ever seen a president drive either.
But, you know, that's not Joe Biden.
What do you mean? Can you explain why it's dumb?
Just because I understand and can communicate the limitations on the progress of innovating aging and cancer doesn't mean I don't simultaneously comprehend the spiritual or metaphysical ramifications of doing something like this.
Personally, I think we're supposed to improve and I doubt that those adjudicating would really spend too much time on the semantics of their own rules.