So, developments this week note that John Durham did not indict anyone involved in the Kislyak leak that led to the persecution of General Flynn, and now there's evidence that the leak came directly from the Obama White House and/or a Democrat in the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and it's nowhere to be found here?

Because the "leak" instead of being a felony, was not a crime?

Because the "leak" was authorized by either Hussein or the SCCI?

And a staffer named Wolf suddenly gets lenient treatment pushed by the same SCCI?

And Techno Fog is all over it, but we're not?

We're not all over how Hussein authorized a leak to jam up General Flynn?

>>13697203

Are you the one that doxxed yourself with a picture here?

If so, you appear to be on a downward spiral, and we all know where that will end.

If your worldview does not allow for you to have a long and happy life, perhaps changing worldviews is in order?

>>13697266

If you're the guy who posted a pic here, please know that I was worried enough about you to add you to my morning prayers.

Here's a link to the fantastic TechnoFog article from yesterday if anyone's interested.

It includes an email from a DNI Hussein insider placing the Kislyak leak on the White House or Democrats in the SCCI.

https://technofog.substack.com/p/on-the-january-2017-felony-leaks

>>13697297

BOOM

All clouds accessed; nothing was permanently deleted.

kek