Q Graphic all in GMT #21
Q Graphics all in GMT Update
Hi Baker, please copy & pasta the following, adding '''s where necessary, to the dough to correct (replace) what is shown here >>1397049 :
Q Graphics all in GMT
Q Graphics all in GMT #01-#05 >>>/comms/486 , >>>/comms/487 , >>>/comms/488
Q Graphics all in GMT #06-#10 >>>/comms/488 , >>>/comms/489 , >>>/comms/490
Q Graphics all in GMT #11-#15 >>>/comms/491 , >>>/comms/545 , >>>/comms/950
Q Graphics all in GMT #16-#20 >>>/comms/951 , >>>/comms/952 , >>>/comms/953 , >>>/comms/987 , >>>/comms/1103
Q Graphics all in GMT #21 >>1397215
Godspeed Baker/s
>>1397279 Looking good, thanks Baker.
One thing, though: you forgot to make Q Graphics all in GMT in bold i.e. "adding '''s where necessary".
>>1397295 Looking good, thanks Baker.
One thing, though: you forgot to make Q Graphics all in GMT in bold i.e. "adding '''s where necessary".
Simple: Leaving no space between and Q Graphics all in GMT .
I've left spaces here in this explanation so you understand.
needs to be at both the beginning and end of the text that you want made bold, without any spaces between the and the text.
N.B. Unlike the red text == malarky, you can make text bold without having to go onto a separate line.
Do some test posts until you figure it out.
>>1397504 You're welcome, and thank you.
Love you, too!
(Certainly no homo - shouldn't feel the need to say that should we!? Love bears no sexuality! Female, I am, so no lezza and no home-wrecker, also! I swear it should be OK to say "love you" without any explanation of your sexual orientation. Strictly platonic, I am and my love is.) ;)