>>13972593 lb
>unsigned Q posts from outside comms
none of the posts or the thread was signed Q
outside from here, sure, but on og 4chan pol… pretty much the only other place online that is at least raised eyebrow worthy.
>but that would also avoid the attention of Anons.
no, it doesn't. eyes are and were on pol, and it was brought to attention.
mostly went under radar, but legitimately so, because it's most likely larp.
>Information is its own interest. That's the whole point of everyone here being anonymous. If the fake Q posts have information then why aren't they simply an Anon?
they were/are.
you would know, but
> I haven't read the latest LARP, so I can't say if it's interesting.
to be fair, not much. mostly recycling Q related material, and announcing a countdown, at a time where pretty much everyone is sick and tired of datefagging of all sorts.
>I can only say, with certainty, that it isn't Q. Because there is no proof that it is.
wrong. you can say with certainty that there is no proof either way… won't be getting published peer-reviewed articles on this or most of the crumbs anytime soon, at many levels it's just not how it works.
i get it, you think i'm pushing this larp, and i could see myself just as irritated in another context. but i'm just reposting fresh today so anons can have eyes on and make their own mind on it. ( >>13972088 lb )
Not all chatter is worth much attention, but if only for a job overall pretty well done, that one gets its turn. But yes, in a way i prefer the idea of this method of plausible deniability applied to making 'new posts that aren't new posts', to the actual example at hand.