>oh yeah classic
I know it's either an act or he is legit batshit crazy, but he is one funny mfer.
>oh yeah classic
I know it's either an act or he is legit batshit crazy, but he is one funny mfer.
>Drug Addict Co-Star: Bill is creepy af.
>Non Drug Addict Co-Star: Good for Bill!
That non-Notable future proves past Q proof looking better by the minute.
Well, you can't brush it aside either in discerning the truth.
If they're saying that as well then they're kinda sketchy.
Bottom Line: Annette needs to show some sauce - because in this current era of Peak Clown World Disinfo it's just another thing to throw on the pile of garbage until proven otherwise.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV1CF3jxvXo
Anon, I believe there are legit habbenings going down right now.
The problem is the people that fear them the most are going to be throwing all kinds of stuff out there to distract and muddy the waters.
The good news is that they wouldn't be doing that if they weren't scared af about what could happen to them.
That's kinda reassuring for believing everything Q told us is coming is still legit.
>~Sgt B
Wow, Patchfaggot (as if the 2 of you aren't the same), you even use the symbol of Fungus, too.
>When are you going to fix that shit you keep leaving in /projectdcomms/ ?
Either:
Stupid and do not realize only Q and Jim/GVs can get into Q's board (but w/o the TC for the latter).
Disingenuous and know it but are trying to fool Anons once again.
Whoa slow down.
That's a GP article he's referring to.
CHECK GP's SOURCE before running with this.
That's still not saying what the source of that info is.
That's still not saying what the source of that info is.
Nice deflection away from the point I was making.
>The warrant, discovered by Forbes this week
This is how you do it right.
Show the article's main points so that sourcing can be determined.
>did not confirm whether or not the investigation was the same as that referred to in the search warrant.
And this is the BIG TAKEAWAY.
This needs follow-up to see if it is indeed the same investigation.
Forbes, not GP, is the base source.
From Dec 2020:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2020/12/04/exclusive-the-fbi-is-investigating-voter-data-theft-in-this-key-2020-election-battleground/?sh=5cb6563634a4
OG Freddy's hash info is from 8chan and he last posted in Dec 2018.
So, BV doesn't have access to that.
Ok, shit diggers.
>welcome to the mystery plageuing wsb too.
The rigging is so deep that I wonder if the protected Hedgies are simply out of reach of wsb's targets.
Blackrock and/or Jamie just move some monies around to cover them every time.
>We're getting the tarmac resolution soon, anons. Sky Harbor airport.
It was absolutely covered here big time.
But, what's your basis for the statement above as things have been dormant for so long (outside of the 'suicide' that is)?