KEK maybe they do have a time machine

https://somebitchtoldme.com/peter-daszak-deleted-evidence-of-gates-funded-conference-he-attended-with-shi-zhengli/?

IN CLOSING

This is one of the missing pieces in putting together where everyone was at the beginning of the Covid-19 outbreak. Right as things were kicking off in China, Daszak and his merry band of medical miscreants were all together discussing the very thing that would soon lock down the entire world. Not only that… did you get a look at that logo?

https://news.clearancejobs.com/2021/06/30/dod-ciso-gets-security-clearance-suspended-for-allegedly-sharing-classified-information/

ARRINGTON’S ROLE AS CISO

Arrington has been in her role as the CISO for USD/AS since August 2020 and was appointed to the DoD CISO role in January 2019. In this role, she leads the effort to address the cybersecurity of the Defense Supply Chain where she evangelized Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) principles designed to enhance the Defense Industrial Base security with her primary focus on the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification process. Both topics have been top of mind these last six months as we’ve learned of Solar Winds and other supply chain compromises affecting not only the DIB community, but global organizations including many with infrastructure responsibilities.

In September 2020, the Department issued an interim rule regarding the implementation of the CMMC which received community pushback from industry. Arrington, in her role would have been responsible for the issuance of the interim rule. In November 2020, Arrington gave Congress an update on her CMMC efforts, noting that suppliers need to “register their own assessments in the supplier risk platform.

Speculation is rampant on what it is that Arrington is alleged to have revealed, including tying her to the allegations being made by a television personality that was being targeted by NSA. According to a Tweet from her attorney Zaid, the investigation into Arrington began approximately six weeks ago and is in no way tied to the allegation associated with NSA.

What was Stacy's "Intent" here

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/stacey-abrams-two-homes-campaign-debt

Former Democratic Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams now owns two homes in Georgia collectively worth $1.4 million despite having been hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt before her unsuccessful run against Gov. Brian Kemp.

Since her electoral failure, though, Abrams has made a series of property purchases in DeKalb County that have been scrubbed from the county tax assessor’s website, according to records obtained by Fox News.

Most county tax assessors in the state of Georgia, such as in Abrams' DeKalb County, have a searchable database for property information, but individuals can request to have their information taken offline.

https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/H1UxTwq2u

China has begun building more than 100 intercontinental ballistic missile storage facilities in the desert near the northwestern city of Log. That's what experts told The Washington Post. This extensive construction may indicate China's intention to dramatically expand its nuclear capabilities.

https://www.businessinsider.com/supreme-court-upholds-arizona-voting-restrictions-in-important-cases-2021-6

The Supreme Court upheld two GOP-passed Arizona voting laws in a ruling.

The court was tasked with deciding whether the laws violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

The case has possible implications for new GOP voting cases and the upcoming redistricting cycle.

The US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to uphold two Arizona voting restrictions in a pair of key cases over whether the laws violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, one of the most important federal civil rights laws.

The cases, Brnovich vs. Democratic National Committee and Arizona Republican Party vs. DNC, were consolidated for one hour of oral arguments in early March and centered on Arizona laws that throw out provisional ballots filed at the wrong precinct and bar third-party groups from returning mail ballots. The petitioners argued the laws are discriminatory in their disproportionate impact on voters of color.