>tyb
Yeah, its great having dead links be posted over and over and over because the baker is too lazy to look for them. kys
Yay, updated with dead links! WOOT what a fantastic baker…… Cause…..yeah!!!!
>Same comms baker that "ghosted" last bread
Mt shocked face. Guess it does not know what ghosted means.
>if the links are dead it's because people got banned
>not the bakers fault
Except im talking about the ones that are there if 10000 breads go past. Shut the fuck up sparky, adults are talking
>>14038788
>dirty onion feels the shill is stronger because the truth is against it.
>>14038817
>when they've been bullied to silence?
Anons obviously havent, I and the anon who responded to me, did exactly that. How big is your nose?
>I guess their nose is so big, the bv they're bitching about deleted i, kek.
Nobody wants a Snuffleupagus showing up to the picknick
>no one cares faggot
>you've long exhausted your credibility
I care and his credibility grows every time one of you insufferable /mnr/ cunts suffers
>Because I don't want to read half a bread of him arguing with shills. ID+ filtering BV is one of the quickest and easiest ways to get rid of shills.
So your answer is that the BV should surrender the place to the shills so that your experience is better?
>>>14038902 (You)
>>everyones mnr
>>everyons comm
>>everyones gerbil
>>everyones doge
>>everyones doodle
So I guess my joy is measurable.
>>>14038920
>It makes more sense if you have been on the board discord when babyfirst admitted to being a Satan worshiper
Well he diddles children so it makes sense.
>>>14038975 (You)
>i dont frequent the commie discord
Your issue not mine. If you are too lazy, or "principled" then dont expect anybody to do your diligence for you. ffs
>if you don't have the proof, dont post the rumor
Those who wont search for the truth, dont deserve it. Kinda like freedom. BTW, your kneepads are worn out.
>that's bakers job, not anons'.
No, its anons. That bakers are willing to add things they also feel are important is a bonus. But if anons want a notable in, its up to them to convey that.
>So you can kick them out like doge, anime and others.
>No one wants to bake while you call everyone a shill.
I feel left out, hes never called me one.
>learn that "hey baker, giving you a second chance to note muh self-nom from last bread" is a quick way to get ignored
> 1-2 dozen notables per day. now it seems like i'm wasting my time, so why bother?
Awwww did this feeling of worthlessness begin after the /mnr/ and company shills started getting the boot?
>All it takes is 1 comment he dosent like.
>Or if you notable content by an anon he hates.
>You will then be labeled after that.
I have said many things he doesnt like, again, I remain here, unbanned as always. Your example is at best flawed at worst, dishonest and im not that lucky.
>i would have definitely ban hammered myself by now and the worst thats happened is i got kicked out of the kitchen once for being a dick
Dont be a dick!
> you've decremented the number of real anons by one.
Good, our quota of sniveling bitches is currently overfull.
>Stroke your own ego more because you dont have the support of anons.
Bu anons, do you mean the other 134 who ARENT agreeing with your stupid statement?
>Some like the hardcore OG way where it's only diggs/Q proofs.
>Others want it to be a news agg since they don't trust anywhere else as a source of them.
>WATN is hardly up anymore and doesn't show the QR ones anyway.
Strange how you go from like to want then onto a segment of trust. When you conflate those things, you can make almost everything debatable.
>You're still "in here" because most if not ALL of your posts all day EVERY DAY
Really? Post one of mine from yesterday. Ill wait.
>I see 2 'anons' from den of retards bitching and crying.
Not bitching or crying at all, just an anon who watched while the /mnr/ crew nearly destroyed this place.
>On the plus side he does have some new memes that don't involve the penis.
GB is droopy?
> just whose punch bowl you are shoving your dick in.
perhaps you should consider, he was invited to do it.
>There is a distinction between resolving or ruling on a dispute and becoming part of it.
No no, you said he needed to consider, now you have been told to do so yourself. Your rules in play, im just following them.
>and i agree. what's wrong with news agg being part of the function of 8kun?
goto freerepublic
And both are babyfister