>>1404611

Yeah, those posts seem well meaning but are not intel at this point. IMO it's indulging wankers to collect posts at the top of the bread just because they're bullet pointy and are signed with a letter. Anons that are interested should archive those in case we later find they have intel value.

>>1404635

I think an additional disclaimer above those if you feel you must notable them. Something like "We don't know what this is about, if anything."

>>1404664

Remember there's shills involved as well, they can take something otherwise innocuous and astroturf it into being a real nuisance that we have to shout down.