> not his last post so……
Q#64
4889 drops after this.
>>14073192
>>14073192
>>14073192
Huh?
The drops all happened in order. Timestamps matter.
Do you deny or confirm that the 'must go for good now' drop was #64?
How many drops were there after that?
Sauce that the drop order has no relevance.
AFAIK, nobody has figured out how to wind the clock. I never said that he would leave and never come back. I pointed out the fact that the drop being referred to was #64, and there were many drops after that. Not everything Q dropped can be taken as gospel.
Call me a shill, whatever. I know I'm not.
I didn't claim it did. I said the drops came in order. Q dropped #1, …, #64, #65, …, #4953
After the first drop there was a second. It's undeniable that they did indeed happen in a linear fashion.
They'll eventually find coordination between the 'private' technofacists. Antitrust
'Private' companies enjoying that protection. Give it up or become public?
I thought it was neck
nice