Thanks anons was looking for that video. I have an mp4 of it on backup somewhere.
If Eric Adams didn't call out the shenanigans going on with the NYC voting system, he'd have lost. Ranked voting crap they came up with. They had to do an investigation. The same investigating they keep saying is un-democratic, racist and disenfranchising.
The N.Y.C. Elections Board Is a Disaster. This Is the Last Straw.
The first number, which the board reported shortly after polls closed on June 22, reflected the first-place votes cast in person during early voting and on Election Day, and they showed Eric Adams with a commanding lead in the Democratic primary. The second number included the full ranked-choice tallies of those same ballots and, to the shock of the political establishment, appeared to show Kathryn Garcia vaulting from third place into a near tie with Mr. Adams. But political observers across the city soon flagged the vote-total discrepancy. So did Mr. Adams, who rightly demanded an explanation for the “irregularities.”
By late afternoon, the board had removed the new results from its website. A few hours later, the explanation came out, and it was a doozy, even by the board’s degraded standards: 135,000 “votes” included in Tuesday’s tally were in fact not real votes, but part of a test run that the board had failed to clear from a computer before posting the numbers to the public.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/30/opinion/nyc-mayor-election-boe-votes.html
31 October 2016
Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms
Mitochondrial damage
Therefore, except for the plasma membrane damage and oxidative stress induction, GFNs can cause apoptosis and/or cell necrosis by direct influencing cell mitochondrial activity
DNA damage
Due to its small size, high surface area and surface charge, GO may possess significant genotoxic properties and cause severe DNA damage, for example, chromosomal fragmentation, DNA strand breakages, point mutations, and oxidative DNA adducts and alterations
Inflammatory response
GFNs can cause a significant inflammatory response including inflammatory cell infiltration, pulmonary edema and granuloma formation at high doses via intratracheally instillation or intravenous administration
--------------—
In the past few years, GFNs have been widely utilized in a wide range of technological and biomedical fields. Currently, most experiments have focused on the toxicity of GFNs in the lungs and livers. Therefore, studies of brain injury or neurotoxicity deserve more attention in the future. Many experiments have shown that GFNs have toxic side effects in many biological applications, but the in-depth study of toxicity mechanisms is urgently needed. In addition, contrasting results regarding the toxicity of GFNs need to be addressed by effective experimental methods and systematic studies. This review provides an overview of the toxicity of GFNs by summarizing the toxicokinetics, toxicity mechanisms and influencing factors and aimed to provide information to facilitate thorough research on the in vitro and in vivo haemo- and biocompatibility of GFNs in the future. This review will help address safety concerns before the clinical and therapeutic applications of GFNs, which will be important for further development of GFNs in biological applications.
https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y
The vaxx could be what they are using to speed up the research on toxicity.
I've always thought the same thing. She acted more like someone who's being led off to an execution.
Useless dregs of society either go into politics or become actors in hollywood. They don't have skills or brains for anything else.
Number on rule of the chans: Don't feed the trolls.
It's merely a tool of distraction. I've been on the chans for 2 decades now and never let them distract me. Even now, I just ignore while going about my work. I don't bother to filter either that's just another distraction.
'Allo. Now that I'm getting more and more free time. I've been going back and going to go full forensic audit on all the Q posts. Gunna take a long ass time.
>Arizona Begins Second Recount to Verify Findings of First Recount
Arizona Senate plans its own recount of ballots at fairgrounds as audit nears end
The Arizona Senate will conduct its own recount of the total number of Maricopa County ballots cast in last fall's election, Senate President Karen Fann said Thursday.
The Senate has purchased two paper-counting machines to serve as a check on the work done by its contractor, Cyber Ninjas, as well as the count done by county elections officials.
Fann called it a "triple-check" on the number of ballots cast as the audit is winding down toward a possible end late next week.
”We’re going to run all the ballots through to see how they match up," she said in an interview an hour after stopping by the audit's new location in a muggy, swamp-cooled building at the state fairgrounds.
“If there ends up being a difference, we’d have another count," Fann said.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2021/07/08/arizona-audit-senate-plans-its-own-recount-ballots-fairgrounds/7906167002/ (pay wall)
https://archive.ph/OQjKz#selection-325.0-325.81
Friday, July 9, 2021 1:30am
What’s to show for two long-running probes?
By Debra J. Saunders / syndicated columnist
Fun fact: It took special counsel Robert Mueller less than two years to release his report into Russian interference in the 2016 election, dubbed Crossfire Hurricane. It’s been more than two years since then Attorney General William Barr named John Durham to head a probe into the origins of the Russian investigation.
One investigation resulted in a raft of indictments and convictions. The other, not so much, probably because Durham is more scrupulous than the Mueller team.
“We’re still interested in the results of John Durham’s investigation,” Steve Groves, a former aide to President Trump now with the Heritage Foundation, told me. “And now that his investigation has lasted longer than the Mueller investigation, hopefully we’ll learn about his findings soon.”
For his troubles, Mueller can boast a long list of scalps. That might lead the public to believe his team uncovered massive wrongdoing in the Trump campaign. That’s not the case.
The March 2019 Mueller report found that Russia did try to tilt the presidential race in Trump’s favor, but the probe “did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” That’s right: no collusion.
Mueller’s biggest fish, Trump’s 2016 campaign chairman Paul Manafort, was convicted for bank and tax fraud that predated the campaign. His sentence: 7 1/2 years.
Former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn pled guilty to lying to the FBI about a post-election conversation with Russian diplomat Sergey Lavrov.
A jury found Trump whisperer Roger Stone guilty of seven felonies, including lying to Congress and obstructing Mueller’s probe. His sentence: 40 months. Trump pardoned Stone and Flynn before they were incarcerated.
After cutting plea deals, George Papadopoulos, a one-time foreign policy adviser to the campaign, served 12 days in federal prison, and Dutch attorney Alex van der Zwaan served 30 days in jail; both for lying to the FBI during the investigation. Such convictions often are referred to as “process crimes” because they involve not original offenses but interactions with the criminal justice system itself.
In contrast, there has been one conviction stemming from the Durham probe for a false statement, and the offender, an FBI lawyer, will not go to jail.
In August, FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith pled guilty to a felony count of making a false statement while working to secure FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) surveillance on Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page.
In the early days of the Russian probe, an FBI official had asked if Page had served as a source for the government, as Page maintained; Clinesmith falsely altered a document by adding “not a source” in a fourth FISA application.
Clinesmith has maintained he thought his alteration was accurate, as if it were an honest mistake.
Be it noted, after the election, Clinesmith texted, “I am so stressed about what I could have done differently”; as well as, “The crazies won finally” and “Viva la resistance!”
Clinesmith’s punishment for making a false statement? Prosecutors recommended three to six months, according to Politico. Federal Judge James Boasberg instead sentenced Clinesmith to 12 months’ probation and 400 hours of community service.
Carter Page generously testified that he did not want Clinesmith to serve time.
“I don’t want him to go to prison” either, former Department of Justice spokesman Mark Corallo told me. But given that Page’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated, “shouldn’t his law license be taken away?”
Now we learn, Clinesmith cut a deal with the Washington, D.C. Bar that, if approved, would allow him to practice law by August.
Corallo is appalled. Clinesmith “shouldn’t be allowed to practice law. He violated somebody’s constitutional rights,” said Corallo. FBI staff shouldn’t use their authority for partisan payback.
“When cops break the rules, we’re supposed to hammer them,” said Corallo. Not in this justice system and with these career bureaucrats.
Random Trump liars go to jail while the FBI liar doesn’t.
The New York Supreme Court suspends the former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani’s law license while a federal judge agrees to allow Clinesmith to return to the law. Yes, I know, Giuliani is an embarrassment, but unlike Clinesmith, he hasn’t been convicted of a felony.
https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/saunders-whats-to-show-for-two-long-running-probes/