Anonymous ID: 0a030d July 28, 2021, 10:43 a.m. No.14215684   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5880

Here's a NIH paper talking about the ZMapp vaccine for Ebola

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/study-finds-ebola-treatment-zmapp-holds-promise-although-results-not-definitive

Notice the big Fauci quote

"Importantly, the study establishes that it is feasible to conduct a randomized, controlled trial during a major public health emergency in a scientifically and ethically sound manner."

So he was running an experiment on people already undergoing the epidemic

Notice the words 'randomized' and 'controlled'

 

Then look at the NYT article

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/26/world/africa/liberian-doctor-treated-with-an-experimental-drug-dies-from-ebola.html

Dr. Abraham Borbor, deputy chief medical doctor at Liberiaโ€™s largest hospital

Died from the ZMapp Ebola vaccine

How does it make sense to try an experimental vaccine on the DEPUTY CHIEF MEDICAL DOCTOR AT LIBERIA'S LARGEST HOSPITAL?

Seems totally randomized

The hospital was a "death trap" of Ebola and killed 22 workers

If the NIH was involved in the area with the vaccine, why didn't they make sure basic safety precautions were in place to prevent the spread?

They should know how to do that being the experts

Unless it was targeted, to get rid of the medical personnel so they could essentially take over - which is not 'randomized'

Or if the NIH is just really bad at preventing the spread of viral infections - which is not 'controlled'

 

They did it for the Spanish Flu in South Africa too

Shit's been going on long before Fauci

He's just carrying the torch