>>14327177 (PB) Hunter's laptop (PB)
"Mild" enough food for Hunter's boyfriend on faux to feed those viewers; "Russian" anything has them wetting their pants and is the ONLY reason this is being "reported" on at all.
Can't have any mention of chyna, or UNDERAGED girls, of course. It will be juuuust enough to be "scandalous" tabloid fodder involving ADULTS.
Aside from that, maybe they'll "report" on Fredo shopping, or eating at a restaurant next.
Dr. Shiva said Orin Hatch… was the reason vaccine-makers can't be sued, but it was Reagan who signed it. It's why lawyers aren't on TV 24-7 asking if yo've had adverse affects from vaccines.
(1)No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.
(2)For purposes of paragraph (1), a vaccine shall be presumed to be accompanied by proper directions and warnings if the vaccine manufacturer shows that it complied in all material respects with all requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.] and section 262 of this title (including regulations issued under such provisions) applicable to the vaccine and related to vaccine-related injury or death for which the civil action was brought unless the plaintiff shows—
(A)that the manufacturer engaged in the conduct set forth in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 300aa–23(d)(2) of this title, or
(B)by clear and convincing evidence that the manufacturer failed to exercise due care notwithstanding its compliance with such Act and section (and regulations issued under such provisions).
(c)Direct warnings
No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, solely due to the manufacturer’s failure to provide direct warnings to the injured party (or the injured party’s legal representative) of the potential dangers resulting from the administration of the vaccine manufactured by the manufacturer.
(d)Construction
The standards of responsibility prescribed by this section are not to be construed as authorizing a person who brought a civil action for damages against a vaccine manufacturer for a vaccine-related injury or death in which damages were denied or which was dismissed with prejudice to bring a new civil action against such manufacturer for such injury or death.
(e)Preemption
No State may establish or enforce a law which prohibits an individual from bringing a civil action against a vaccine manufacturer for damages for a vaccine-related injury or death if such civil action is not barred by this part.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/300aa-22
https://www.citizensjournal.us/18-reasons-i-wont-be-getting-a-covid-vaccine/