>>14357398

TYB!

(all below pb)

>>14356579

>>14356286, >>14354559 (PB), SQL database holds data and take a second look at the dominion manual to validate, based on xref of a voter database for Mesa county

Anon, one way to "prove" it is geolocation, which appears to have been turned on in the image.

I extracted the Registry data, it's uploaded at catbox, link in image.

>>14341782

The above should link to the post, so you don't have to retype the catbox link.

>>14341816

The above was a question I asked about the Registry geolocation data that I posted – how to convert it to latitude/longitude pair? I still haven't found the answer to that question, yet.

>>14354559

>How do we prove that these came from the Dominion server in Colorado?

>I think the key is going to be analyzing the contents of the SQL databases, or something. Could really use some help from a higher-ranking anon….

If we can show this server image lived in a particular building, it would help demonstrate the veracity of where it came from.

And you're right, the SQL database might have more to show.

>>14357458

>Whoa!

>Notable

Thank you sir! You gonna need a bigger boat? :)

I did some exploration of the geolocation.

Fired up a Win10 VM, looked into how to read the geolocation from the Registry; and, it appears the only way is to "activate the I lost my device stuff".

Don't want to do that as part of the investigation.

So, looking for the algorithm.

Or which DLL calls would be necessary, to "invoke the algorithm."

Perhaps the algorithm only resides on Microsoft's servers, which is why one has to activate the "I lost my device" function?

Anyone here work for Microsoft, and might check?

>>14357957

>I live in Mesa County. What do you want me to do?

Thank you! Nothing I can think of though. Think these server images came from Tina Peters' office, in Colorado.

If you know how to convert the Windows Registry data that has the geolocation to latitude/longitude coordinates, then we can help prove whether the two images came from her office.

Both images had the same geolocation data, in that portion of the Registry.

So both images "came from the same place"; we just have to figure out how to get "the place" from "the data."

Preferably without going through Microsoft's "I lost my device" functionality, if possible; if not, guess I'll burn a license doing that? (What's $100 or so if we're saving the country?)