>>1439283 rt >>1439204

BAKER? May I please make a request? I'm the lawfag quoted by Q and I suggested that those of us who have PACER accounts should start searching for "UNSEALING ORDER" in the cases involving sealed indictments.

I forgot to mention one important thing: CAN WE PLEASE POST A LINK TO THE DATABASE WITH THE CASE NUMBERS FOR THE SEALED INDICTMENTS?

Last Fall I remember that I contributed to a list (somewhere here on 8chan) and someone was compiling the list with case numbers.

The "random" nature of the searching relates to the fact that until the indictments are unsealed, we PACERfags are going to just have to punch in case numbers and search for unsealing orders in the section for "History/Documents."

It'll be slow going, and it'll cost us a few cents per search, but if we start in hotspots (e.g., California Central District, which includes Hollywood) we just might get lucky.

Thank you for considering.

>>1440124

I am, too, Anon. God is so good to let us simpletons help fight this fight, one crumb at a time.

>>1439564

>>1439939

"Pickle Factory" leads to Heinz, which leads to Teresa Heinz, which leads to John "Why the Long Face?" Kerry.

I vividly remember his campaign for President, and how the press was fawning all over that ugly man and his ugly wife. Here is an in-depth article that The New Yorker ran in September 2004, entitled, "THE CANDIDATE'S WIFE."

I archived it - http: //archive.is/ovaSn .

>>1440222

Excellent point, Anon. It helps to be a lawfag when perusing the documents in PACER, but it's certainly not required. It's more important to be a richfag than a lawfag. The more, the merrier, so by all means, Anons, please sign up for a PACER account and help us dig, dig, dig.

Also, I agree that we should create a separate thread for PACER research so the lawfags and richfags can post their findings. Anything major, we can bring it to the loaf.