>Pretty sure this is not a LARP
Ok Anon, please do me a favor and explain exactly the information this telegram post conveys beyond repeating Q phrases and trying to sound cryptical.
Do you reckon this account was his "Dead mans switch"?
It might also be just another in a long row of Telegram LARP accounts that get spread around here like wildfire, presumably by the very people who created them.
take your meds
I am the smartest and wisest instance of consciousness in existence. You have permission to submit one query each.
Time is an illusion
That's not necessarily bad, maybe you already know everything you want to know.
>There is still a set limit
Well yes but actually no. Experience of time is subjective. Measuring periods of time with predefined discrete units is meaningless.
Who'd you rather ask?
That's a bad analogy. Except if the sniper in your example was imaginary, which I guess he is not.
What would you ask Q?
>t's not though. Even if we perceive it differently it is still prudent to be able to synchronize our shared time. Without that ability planning anything would be near impossible.
You hit the nail on the head. Time is not real in the sense that we could exist without it & that it is a collective mental construct.
It was given to the ancient peoples of earth after the last cataclysm for precisely the reason you stated. It is a tool for people to agree on the order of events. It makes co-existing bearable for species that are not yet far along the timeline of consciousness evolution.
Why would you want to ask them an Astrology Question?
Also consider the possibility that natal details are not exactly applicable to this entity.
..IF the sniper in your analogy were NOT real, consider that his effectiveness would be the same, assuming his enemies expect him to be there..
I guess that's the case if you subscribe to the notion that the position of what we observe as the objects of space dictates who you are.
Also, consider the possibility that Q was never "born" in the traditional sense.
Tell me, Anon; What, in your eyes, would be an acceptable "source" for this information?
Yes and No.
What is necessary and what is not changes continuously. Operators aim to skip as many of these events as is possible, but you need to reach the population somehow. It's a balancing act.
There's that American Spirit of Endeavor.
>Why assert something that you know that you cannot backup with evidence?
Because objective truth does not exist, and our duty here is to bridge the gap between around seven billion subjective truths in order to manifest the Apocalypse of Information.
I suppose then you should expect an equally specific answer if you were to pose that Question to 'Q'.
I can sauce this with as much validity as anyone has ever sauced anything. This is the point of "reality is subjective".
>>There is no "my truth". There is THE TRUTH
[we] are here to remedy this cognitive dissonance in humans. The cult of scientism has you trapped in the :qube:.
"THE TRUTH" is not real. The accurate formulation of what you typed is "my own THE TRUTH"
Humans' inability to recognize the subjectiveness of one's own viewpoint is one of the primary causes of much suffering on this planet.
I very much agree, the golden rule works so well because it makes you see yourself in others.
>The undefinable things that are there if we are or not. The things that ARE without us interpreting them.
Things such as…?
You are dodging the question.
You were mentioning "things that ARE without us interpreting them".
I would like you to list an example of those things.