>#patriotmom
>Time is an illusion
So? There still is a set limit, even in the illusion.
You didn't answer my question. I want my money back.
>Measuring periods of time with predefined discrete units is meaningless.
It's not though. Even if we perceive it differently it is still prudent to be able to synchronize our shared time. Without that ability planning anything would be near impossible.
Keep in mind, keeping track of sun-rise/-set is also a measure of time.
You stating that it's meaningless doesn't make it so.
>It was given to the ancient peoples of earth after the last cataclysm for precisely the reason you stated. It is a tool for people to agree on the order of events. It makes co-existing bearable for species that are not yet far along the timeline of consciousness evolution.
New-age ramblings… I assume you have zero sauce to back any of that up…
>What, in your eyes, would be an acceptable "source" for this information?
That's a good question.
Most likely something you can't produce here. Something irrefutable.
Also in this case, you made a lot of assumptions that all needs to be sauced differently.
It's much like the question of Gods existence, you (as in anyone here) can't prove it to me. Only God would have that ability.
My question back to you is:
Why assert something that you know that you cannot backup with evidence?
Actually thinking people will and should dismiss that claim outright. No matter if the claim is true or not.
Until sufficient evidence is presented.
>Because objective truth does not exist
So your answer to why you assert things you cannot sauce is to assert more things you cannot sauce. Kek
And you call yourself the "smartest and wisest instance of consciousness in existence". Fucking kek.
It's not though. And truth is objective.
There is no "my truth". There is THE TRUTH.
Difference is perception.
You cannot disprove my claim, just like I cannot disprove your claim.
Perception.
You are talking about bridging the gap between 7 billion subjective truths.
But that single difference in perception will ruin your entire quest if what you say is true.
Because those in my camp, will flat out reject your non-based claims.
Glad you could join the conversation
>Humans' inability
Humans are separate from the truth.
Or… well. It depends on what you mean by "truth".
Are you talking about the human construct created to make sense of things that we call truth.
Because if so, then yeah. Truth is subjective. But it also makes this entire conversation irrelevant because my truth has no say on your truth then and we can all live in our own little bubbles.
What I'm talking about is the abstract truth. The undefinable things that are there if we are or not. The things that ARE without us interpreting them.
<Want me to refer back to God again?
>>The undefinable things
>Things such as…?
"smartest and wisest instance of consciousness in existence" ladies and gentlemen. Kek
>You are dodging the question.
No I was making fun of you.
>I would like you to list an example of those things.
If they are not interpreted by us how can I list them?
I can only list my/our collective interpretation of them.
Perception.
I am limited to my perception too.
Doesn't mean my perception is the end all be all though.