>>14605086

My take is the evidence is out there and can't be put back in the tube.

So go to limited hang out. Yep. It was civilians. Our bad. But stand by intel.

'Stand by intel' means we're not going to say who the intel was, because, you know, opsec. Have to protect our assets.

If McKenzie decided to investigate, then asset would have to be burned for an official investigation I think.. It wouldn't be pretty.

What's this mean? Something like, perhaps, intel came from some talibanner who, for shits and giggles, got the US to take out an anti-talibanner. Could have looked bad if the talibanners did it themselves, so get the dumbfucks in the US to do it for us, since they're desperate to do something to try to save face from us exploding a bomb in their KIA security midst.

If there's a silver lining to this low-ceiling overcast, maybe it's after Milley & the treasonous China calls and Mckenzire and his, "My bad, guys", about the dead kids, it's a 3 on a match scenario and whatever the 3rd light up is, it exposes the whole diseased, fucking corrupt temple.

>>14605341

Yep. Totally agree.

Only thing I'd add is, Milley's first sentence was. "Nancy told me to call."

>>14605357

>top General

I don't think, and/or hope, that he's the top general.

I'd go with the chief liaison guy between the military, the administration and congress. Coordinates and grooms messages.

Top military wouldn't being saying anything. Cheyenne Mountain guys. The ones Trump says he'll give us the names of some day.

Saw a report a hour or so ago that Milley was telling Pentagon flunkies to stand by him in some (not so, anymore) secret meeting. This is going to blow up. Almost sure, now, that there is a split military currently.

Occam says Milley is a political animal, looking to pad his future. He'd have been instant gone in a Trump second term, and Pelosi made him a better deal. Positive to that is, it was the best Pelosi could do. That's not enough if she (along with Heels) were demanding the nuke codes a few weeks later. Chinese weren't convinced Milley (and by extension, Pelosi) could deliver shit.

Wasn't Gen. Mike Flynn's General brother promoted to Pacific Command (I think) around that time? Will the Chinese believe what Milley says, or go to reading the tea leaves on a Gen. Flynn's promotion? Going here, with the unlikely probability of anybody named Flynn being promoted to a critical command poistion in a Bidan administration.