Speaking of alphabet agencies… has anyone considered Q's ultimate motivations here?
Consider the following scenario. You, personally, are aware of a lot of details concerning an active investigation of a group murdering, raping, and eating children.
Do you:
>shut the fuck up, watch the group, and arrest their members the moment they pick up a child?
>arrest them right away
>tell everyone on Facebook the names and addresses of every group member and warn them not to let them babysit
>Drop subtle hints on a message board popular with pedophiles, that only people who are intimately familiar with group operations can figure out?
The first two are good LE tactics. Which one's better depends on your confidence in alphabet agency planning.
The third assumes you have zero confidence in LE, but at least warns SOMEONE with concrete, actionable data.
The fourth option warns THE CANNIBAL PEDOS long before any normie can figure out WHO they're being warned about. Now, what happens if you warn a bunch of kidnappers that the Feds are on to them?
They start covering up evidence.
Leaking information about the investigation to 8chan/8kun/4chan is a sensible move if you're part of the pedo cult and your objective is to HELP the perps cover it up. It's a really STUPID move if your objective is to prosecute the pedo cult or to rescue their victims.
>but these Q proofs show that Important Person D is working with Q
Proving that someone important is working with Q shows they're working together. IT DOES NOT SHOW WHAT SIDE THEY'RE WORKING TOGETHER FOR. Remember Revelations 13… THE BEAST AND THE DRAGON WERE BOTH WORSHIPPED.
>but lookit this meme of hillary laughing with a horrible caption
So? Anyone can associate the politicians they dislike with captions that imply they're monsters. Here, have some.
>but I like Trump and Q says he likes Trump so Q must be good
Registered Republican? You've gotten a phone call from the Republican National Congressional Committee asking you to 'renew' a membership that you never had in the first place. You can't assume someone's honest just because he says he likes Trump. That's just ASKING to be ripped off.
>but some anon said a blurry phonecam video from 1984 showed something monstrous being done by someone who was probably a white woman! And it was deleted from youtube which proves it's real!
Check out this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TorbaRape
Not on Youtube. Does that mean Youtube is trying to cover up Andrew Torba raping a kid? Or does that mean that plugging random-ass 404s into Youtube doesn't get you valid vids?
There's also the minor detail that Hillary's not the only white woman in the US…
>but if you question Q you're a pedovore!!!!
This is a cheap trick to silence dissenters.
>but how would pedos find 8chan/4chan posts?
Oldfags are aware that both 8chan and 4chan had reps for CP. While the MSM picture did exaggerate them, there was a real pedo problem on the chans. The entire premise of pizzagate was the claim that DNC insiders were USING CHANNER SLANG TO DESCRIBE CHILD PORNOGRAPHY. This implies that they were oldfags themselves.
But, okay, you could imagine that the pedos went away. Don't you think they might notice they've been outed WHEN CHANNERS START TO CALL THEM UP AND MAKE THREATS? If I call YOU up and start telling people I know you've got kids chained up in the basement and imma gonna hang you with your own intestines, YOU will laugh and hang up and do nothing… because you don't have kids in the basement. An ACTUAL Dutroux/Brady/Mason-tier pedo will start to think it's time to kill their victims and lay low for a while. 8kun isn't some super secret club that only unimportant people know about! Don Jr. browses here (and if he picked the wrong boards, the FBI is going to have his browsing records). Eric browses here. All the people the Q influencers scream "SHIILLL!!!!" at? Think for a minute! If some shadowy cabal is paying people to post messages undermining Trump or National Socialism, the shadowy cabal is also able to read all the Q posts.
There are three options that make sense.
Option 1 is that Q is a schizo who believes his posts are true.
Option 2 is that Q is a conscious hoaxer.
Option 3 is that the pedo rings Q warns us about have some grounding in reality… AND Q IS A MEMBER.
If option 3 is real, I will ALSO note that it is very likely that Q would distort information about the cabal to lead outsiders (that's CHANNERS here!) AWAY from the real target. E.G. if Q were part of a DEMOCRATIC pedovore cabal, he would implicate REPUBLICANS. Now… who did Q choose to point us at?