Why keep him in line? Is he directly involved in the Sussman case? What is it that he was doing that constituted the "assassination" of his wife, who was born in the Soviet Union and grew up in a military base in the Arctic?
It just seems to me that there are other things involved in this case that have nothing to do with "Clinton ordered a hit job" on a cinematographer and director in Hollywood.
I would be more apt to blame the shutdowns during the pandemic, and our clear political divides in this country; as the most careful and safety oriented people to handle firearms are more than likely conservative.
The movie set was having problems with the union and safety wasn't being done properly. Someone will be held to account for this, and Alec Baldwin may have some culpability to answer for as he was the one pointing the gun.
I am certain that the director and the cinematographer were working to get a great closeup of Alec pointing a gun and firing it. The Director and Cinematographer work very very close together as the director needs to see what the camera person is seeing so as they can come to a decision on whether or not the scene was done to their specifications and expectations.
-
Director needed closeup of Alec firing a pistol at proximity to the camera
-
Cinematographer and director disallowed for their own safety by being within said close proximity
-
Alec failed by pointing the weapon directly at the cinematographer, of which the director was more than likely cheek-to-cheek with as both were watching how the scene would play out
-
The crew failed to check the round and was in disarray over prior safety and work conditions
Many factors played into this tragedy, and just to jump to some unproven conspiracy theory to explain how a person got killed and another injured is just ridiculous.
CLINTON HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SHOOTING!
Point
Blank
and
Simple.