Anonymous ID: 073036 Oct. 27, 2021, 4:38 p.m. No.14869260   🗄️.is đź”—kun

President Biden’s Infrastructure Deal: Better Public Transit

 

Oct 27, 2021

The White House

1.9M subscribers

 

Simeon commutes 2.5 hours on public transit (each way) for his retail job.

 

President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal will help Simeon — and millions of Americans — get around more easily.

 

 

https://youtu.be/Hl_DOkw7ISk

Anonymous ID: 073036 Oct. 27, 2021, 4:43 p.m. No.14869283   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9437

 

Former Undercover FBI agent, Marc Ruskin, Discusses the Purging of Our Bill of Right | Oct. 27, 2021

 

 

 

Oct 27, 2021

 

Rudy W. Giuliani

575K subscribers

 

Don’t forget to comment below with your Common Sense and subscribe to my podcast at www.RudyGiulianiCS.com

 

https://youtu.be/1YGIadGQaCQ

Anonymous ID: 073036 Oct. 27, 2021, 4:49 p.m. No.14869316   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>14869098

4529

Jun 26, 2020 4:02:11 PM EDT

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6

https://twitter.com/HouseGOP/status/1276589294010982401

Did order(s) violate government mandated policies?

Would a jury of peers agree their actions were reckless?

Would a jury of peers agree their actions were negligent?

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-11/suits-against-state-officials

"The immunity of a state from suit has long been held not to extend to actions against state officials for damages arising out of willful and negligent disregard of state laws.165 The reach of the rule is evident in Scheuer v. Rhodes,166 in which the Court held that plaintiffs were not barred by the Eleventh Amendment or other immunity doctrines from suing the governor and other officials of a state alleging that they deprived plaintiffs of federal rights under COLOR of state law and seeking damages, when it was clear that plaintiffs were seeking to impose individual and personal liability on the officials. There was no “executive immunity” from suit, the Court held; rather, the immunity of state officials is qualified and varies according to the scope of discretion and responsibilities of the particular office and the circumstances existing at the time the challenged action was taken."

Q