Found: Reliable 8kun IP address

So I cycled through all of the 8kun addresses to see if one or more of them actually work reliably instead of going dead every so often. Some addresses are unresponsive 1 time out of 3 and others 1 time out of 5 or so. The only address that is consistently working is this one:

23.163.176.229

That address is not even assigned to 8kun. It is assigned to dailystormer.su which is a Vanwanet client so that's why it works. This is very suspicious. I'm thinking that Vanwanet is deliberately sabotaging 8kun. Or it could be the DDoS protection service which, as far as I know, is still DDoS-Guard (https://ddos-guard.net).

This is just a preliminary report. I will post again if I notice anything else.

>>14868972

>White hats cut them off, and their funds are drying up quickly.

A few million bucks isn't going to help them much. This is about power projection.

>>14868973

>A couple of the 8Kun servers are located in China

No. Those are DNS servers. They are not related to 8kun. They are just DNS servers for the .top domain.

By the way, the /alleycat/ link is my report on this. Keep posting it though. Not enough anons are aware.

>>14869050

More and more, it seems to me that it is not actually Julian Assange who is in custody. They don't want anybody to find out.

>>14869104

>How reliable can those DNS servers in China be ?

2 out of the 6 servers are compromised and have been since the end of April. I have not seen any issues in terms of response time or uptime.

At this point, I don't know how much blame can be placed directly on Vanwanet.

>>14869278

And I Dream of Jeannie had a genie and an astronaut. More comms?

>>14869308

>DANIEL BOONE WAS A MAN…….A BIG MAN

Mighty Paul Bunyan was bigger, much bigger, kek.

>>14869353