>>14875901 (PB)

since this made notables (??) I think anons should read this:

for other anons who don't remember..the screencap/MAP that was posted along with the tripcode was MISSING 1 post from that first post's bread by the same id

go to:

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/147075091/#147104628

cont+f

type into box → P3Lk4PKG

this is the ID for the first post in the graphic, only it's NOT…but it is, according to the archive..

The ID in the acknowledged screencap doesn't match what's now on the 4plebs archive…nor does it match what I screencapped at the time

regardless, there is one additional post in that bread above by the same ID, that was NOT on the graphic. The first 2 Q posts have always been debated, but anons decided to leave them in for historical purposes, I think, given that definitively 1 legit provable Q post was left out.

Lastly, with this thought, IF those first two Q posts aren't legit/counted… then we would be two post #s ahead, and that would be interesting given all of the Q proofs we've spotted to correlate to post #s..

last thought - if those two weren't legit, Q probably would have told us.. and if not, they must have decided to roll with it for a reason.. interdesting, eh?

bake your noodle

happy 4 years anons!

still here, still fighting

never give up, never give in!

for the kids, God, and humanity…

o7